Wikipedia:Community case RK
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Previous content temporarily blanked. See also RK's cases at RfC 1, RfC 2, arbitration 1, arbitration 2.
> What course of action is left?
Here's one option:
- Robert accepts that it is wrong to insult people on Wikipedia, apologises, and agrees not to do so in the future.
- Those who Robert has insulted accept his apology, forgive him, and agree not to bring up the subject in the future.
- Robert accepts that it is wrong to ask for bona fide Wikipedians to be banned, apologises, and stops doing so.
- Those who Robert has asked to be banned accept his apology, forgive him, and agree not to bring up the subject in the future.
- Robert accepts that it is wrong to accuse bona fide Wikipedians of being vandals, apologises, and stops doing so.
- Those who Robert has accused of being vandals accept his apology, forgive him, and agree not to bring up the subject in the future.
- Those who created all the junk on this topic accept that it was wrong to create so much junk, apologise for doing so, and agree not to do so in the future.
- Those who were affected by all the junk on the subject accept the collective apology, forgive those who created it, and agree not to bring up the subject in the future.
- All the junk on this topic, scattered over various talk pages, user talk pages, ban pages, mailing lists, etc, is all sent to the big recycle bin in the sky.
- Time passes.
- People start to forgive.
- People start to forget.
-- Martin
13. Dandelions and poppyflowers and field grasses begin to grow. --Stevertigo
14. And there's no more war, and no more hunger, and Wikilove prevails forever and ever. --NetEsq