Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220fc233916612b

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Video scaler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grammer and structure cleanup More research on the topic will be welcomed. Commando happy!® 06:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added to User:Tmorton166/Desk RJFJR 02:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scalers convert video format information to one of many resolutions (480p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p). Scalers, although often confused with converters, perform a different function. Upconvertion is a process by which a signal is altered from an inferior format to a superior one. ie, from composite video to component video, or from component video to DVI or HDMI. Scalers can make standard definition television programming look cleaner and more appealing when viewed on a high definition screen. Scalers come packaged in audio-video receivers or as a stand alone unit.

--SoundAdviceJax 15:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the whole section on interlacing is misplaced. For two reasons. Firstly, video scalers commonly perform deinterlacing (not interlacing). Secondly, deinterlacing has it's own article which appears to go into more details.

Also, I think the term Video Processor is a little more common these days. Technically a Video Scaler just wouldn't also deinterlace, but upon doing some googling, there's a lot of confusion of terms out there in the market. Perhaps Video Scaler should just redirect to Video Processor which can cover all the possible features such as deinterlacing, scaling and conversion to different video formats.

MichaelJHuman 14:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Closed. Looks OK IMHO RJFJR (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]