Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
| This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by AnomieBOT (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
| Skip to current discussions · |
Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename, or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming, and stub articles.
For general discussion about the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Wikipedia talk:Categorization, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.
How to use CfD
[edit]For detailed instructions about using CfD, see § How to nominate a category for discussion below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:
- Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see § Speedy renaming and merging below.
- Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.
Important: In general, do not depopulate a category when nominating it for CfD. If, during (or just prior to) the discussion, you modify the population of a category, or in other ways edit the category while it is subject to a CfD discussion, note that you did so in the CfD (for transparency), and be prepared to revert your edits upon community request. Such editing can hamper other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.
If you have an issue with a CfD closure, and discussion on the CfD closer's talk page does not resolve the issue, the process at Wikipedia:Deletion review is used to ask the community to review a CfD closure (as long as all steps are followed), to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
Wikipedia:Move review is used for a CfD closure that is limited in scope to renaming.
Current discussions
[edit]Closing procedure
[edit]After seven days, an administrator (or possibly a non-admin) will determine if consensus has formed, and close the discussion. If appropriate, the discussion instead may be relisted to allow for more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented. As noted at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-admins may follow the process at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working, and list discussion results there for an admin to review, and to log to the page directly.
Discussions awaiting closure
[edit]| V | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CfD | 0 | 65 | 109 | 51 | 225 |
| TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 |
| MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FfD | 0 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 50 |
| RfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 |
| AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 22 |
- List of links to individual open discussions (>7 days old): Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Old unclosed discussions - updated by User:AnomieBOT
- Full text of all open discussions (>7 days old): Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/All old discussions - powered by a Lua module parsing /Old unclosed discussions
- List of days with open discussions (>7 days old): included below from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Awaiting closure – powered by a Lua module parsing /Old unclosed discussions
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 16 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 15 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 14 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 13 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 12 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 11 (4 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 10 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 9 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 8 (6 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 7 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 6 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 5 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 4 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 3 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 2 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 September 1 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 31 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 30 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 29 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 28 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 27 (6 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 26 (25 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 25 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 24 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 23 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 22 (4 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 21 (6 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 20 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 19 (8 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 18 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 17 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 14 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 12 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 11 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 10 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 7 (4 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 5 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 4 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 2 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 August 1 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 29 (1 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 28 (4 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 27 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 26 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 25 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 24 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 22 (6 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 21 (4 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 20 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 19 (3 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 18 (7 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 16 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 15 (2 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 14 (5 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 9 (6 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 July 8 (4 open)
How to nominate a category for discussion
[edit]Nomination procedure
[edit]Twinkle
[edit]You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.
Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, see § MassCFD.
MassCFD
[edit]You can use the script User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD to automatically make mass nominations.
Manual nominations
[edit]| I | Preliminary steps.
Before nominating a category:
In the following special cases:
For further information, see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. |
| II | Edit the category.
Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion.
|
| III | Create the CFD section.
Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries. Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the
|
Stub types
[edit]| I | Preliminary steps.
In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:
|
| II | Edit the template.
Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.
|
| III | Create the CFD section.
Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries. Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):
|
Notifying interested projects and editors
[edit]In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.
- Notifying related WikiProjects
WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2026 September 24|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.
Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.
- Notifying substantial contributors to the category
While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.
- Notifying other interested editors
It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.
Speedy renaming and merging
Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested if they meet one of the speedy criteria listed below. To nominate a category:
- Determine which speedy criterion applies.
- Tag the category page with
{{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}or{{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}}. - List the request along with a speedy criteria reason at § New requests.
Speedy requests must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points but only at a full discussion at Categories for discussion.
The nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience. Categories that qualify for speedy deletion can be tagged with the regular speedy tags with no required delay or listing. Renaming under C2E may be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation on G7.
Opposing
Requests generally take about 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the criteria and raise any objections.
To oppose a speedy request, insert this immediately under the nomination:
* '''Oppose''': Explain your objection. ~~~~
If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process speedy nominations. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a regular CfD discussion. Unless you withdraw your opposition, the nomination may be turned into a regular CfD discussion.
Contested speedy requests become stale and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{Moved from|. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at CfD in accordance with its instructions.[[WP:CFDS]]|~~~~}}
Speedy criteria
The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming or merging are strictly limited to:
C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes
- Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between American and British spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however, if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other, then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
- Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
- Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.
C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices
- Conforming with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
- Expanding abbreviated country names (e.g. U.S. → United States).
- Disambiguation fixes from an unqualified name (e.g. Category:Washington → Category:Washington (state) or Category:Washington, D.C.).
C2C: Consistency with established category tree names
- Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "X by Y", "X of Y", or "X in Y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names.
- This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
- This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case, then the category in question must be brought forward to a full CfD nomination.
- This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transport in the United Kingdom and Category:Transportation in the United States).
C2D: Consistency with main article's name
- Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
- This applies only if the related page's current name (and, by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
- unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
- uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination).
- C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
- This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
- Before nominating a category to be renamed per C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.
- Just disagreeing with the article title is not enough reason to oppose a C2D request. Instead, if someone disagrees with the article title, they can start a WP:RM procedure on the article talk page and they can request the CFDS discussion be put on hold while the RM discussion is running. However, arguing that it is desirable to have the article and the category at different titles may be an adequate reason to oppose C2D.
C2E: Author request
- This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
- The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.
C2F: One eponymous page
- This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable.
- Nominations should use
{{subst:cfm-speedy}}(speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination at WP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.
| Administrators and page movers: Do not use the "Move" tab to move categories listed here!Categories are processed following the 48-hour waiting period and are moved by a bot. |
When handling the listings:
- Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
- With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
- Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.
If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.
A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
- The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
- No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
The closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised, then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.
For out of process deletions, check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the CfD process. After renaming, copy and paste the listing to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.Current requests
[edit]If the category does not match one of the above criteria or you are not sure it qualifies, do not list it here. Instead, use the main CfD process. Requests may be completed if more than 48 hours old; i.e., if the nomination was created before 17:27, 22 September 2026 (UTC). Currently, there are 27 open requests ().
To list it here, use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list:
* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use:
* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
If human action is required, e.g. updating templates that populate the category, use:
* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}
New requests
[edit]- Category:Bill Anderson (singer) songs to Category:Bill Anderson songs - C2D--Ymblanter (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Glasgow Society of Women Artists member to Category:Glasgow Society of Women Artists members – C2B: pluralise. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:20, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Canbodian political artists to Category:Cambodian political artists – C2A. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:10, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:English mixed media artists to Category:English mixed media artists – C2C: Category:Mixed-media artists. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:32, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:British mixed media artists to Category:British mixed media artists – C2C: Category:Mixed-media artists. 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:32, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Canadian mixed media artists to Category:Canadian mixed-media artists – C2C: Category:Mixed-media artists 1234qwer1234qwer4 04:31, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Members of artistic organizations to Category:Members of arts organizations – C2C: Category:Arts organizations. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:56, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Sokol in the United States to Category:Sokol movement in the United States – C2D: Sokol movement, see below. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Sokol to Category:Sokol movement – C2D: Sokol movement. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:54, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Indigenous organisations in North America to Category:Indigenous organizations in North America – C2C: Only member of Category:Organizations based in North America by subject spelt with an s, and subcategories use a z as well. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:39, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Blizzard games to Category:Blizzard Entertainment games – C2C: Category:Blizzard Entertainment. Go D. Usopp (talk) 02:04, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Films scored by Richard Marvin to Category:Films scored by Richard Marvin (composer) – C2D: Richard Marvin (composer). DoubleCross (‡) 00:12, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Nymph stub to Category:Nymph stubs – C2C: Stub categories (and categories in general) are usually pluralized. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 23:42, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Opposed requests
[edit]- Category:Yap family to Category:Yap family (Tarlac) – C2C: Please change the category name from Yap family to Yap family (Tarlac). Toniker0501 (talk) 06:14, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Toniker0501: how is this a case of C2C? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose, I don't think this satisfies C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Trinity College (Canada) alumni to Category:Alumni of Trinity College, Toronto – C2C: to match related categories (i.e. Category:Alumni of Victoria College, Toronto) and main article title (Trinity College, Toronto). RapidDweller (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose the standard is X college alumni, see Category:Alumni by university or college in Ontario. The others should be renamed to match this one.--User:Namiba 19:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
- The format you suggest is awkward when applied to colleges of the form "X College, Y" (like Trinity College, Toronto) and the standard category format for these (outside of Ontario at least) is "Alumni of X College, Y" and not "X College, Y alumni". There was a CfD here recently where this was agreed to (if I'm not mistaken). For example, the alumni category for Trinity College, Cambridge is Category:Alumni of Trinity College, Cambridge, not Category:Trinity College, Cambridge alumni. RapidDweller (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Would Category:Trinity College, Cambridge, alumni not be the correct formatting in this case, with the additional comma separating the name? Though I don't strictly oppose "Alumni of", as I know there are plenty of categories with that formation in their title instead, so long as some version of the current name remains as a {{catred}}. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any examples of that format with the comma used? I'm not opposed to that either, however I'm going off of the established convention I've seen, which is "Alumni of X College, Y". RapidDweller (talk) 19:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- That I don't know, actually, and I'm not entirely sure how to find them given the difficulty of search for results based on specific punctuation. I was thinking of instances where place names are in categories, e.g. People from Austin, Texas, by occupation. I guess it might depend on if "Trinity College, Cambridge" is the full name of the school or if "Cambridge" is a disambiguator. In the latter case, I think it makes sense to use a comma there, because comma-separated place names like administrative divisions of countries have them in general and I think this would be the same case. But I could just be talking out of my ass, to be fair. I'm not sure this is addressed in the MoS, I didn't see it. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:09, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
- Are there any examples of that format with the comma used? I'm not opposed to that either, however I'm going off of the established convention I've seen, which is "Alumni of X College, Y". RapidDweller (talk) 19:43, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Would Category:Trinity College, Cambridge, alumni not be the correct formatting in this case, with the additional comma separating the name? Though I don't strictly oppose "Alumni of", as I know there are plenty of categories with that formation in their title instead, so long as some version of the current name remains as a {{catred}}. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- The format you suggest is awkward when applied to colleges of the form "X College, Y" (like Trinity College, Toronto) and the standard category format for these (outside of Ontario at least) is "Alumni of X College, Y" and not "X College, Y alumni". There was a CfD here recently where this was agreed to (if I'm not mistaken). For example, the alumni category for Trinity College, Cambridge is Category:Alumni of Trinity College, Cambridge, not Category:Trinity College, Cambridge alumni. RapidDweller (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose the standard is X college alumni, see Category:Alumni by university or college in Ontario. The others should be renamed to match this one.--User:Namiba 19:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)
On hold pending other discussion
[edit]- Category:Cultural institutions and organizations in Chicago to Category:Cultural institutions based in Chicago – C2C: parent is Cultural institutions and : Organizations based in Chicago SMasonGarrison 17:01, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Let's wait until this discussion closes. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:09, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Sounds good. :) SMasonGarrison 23:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Let's wait until this discussion closes. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:09, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Moved to full discussion
[edit]- Category:Curacao Neptunus players to Category:Neptunus players – C2D: based on advice from QuietHere.HonkBase (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:DOOR Neptunus players to Category:Neptunus players – C2D: based on advice from QuietHere.HonkBase (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Traditional Cults to Category:Religious cults – C2D: per my discussion with @Michael Aurel. I am the creator of this category.GastonN'estPasBon (talk) 12:42, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Where? @Marcocapelle can you link it please GastonN'estPasBon (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- They did, and you replied to them in the thread one minute before posting this reply. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- I got confused, apologies. GastonN'estPasBon (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- They did, and you replied to them in the thread one minute before posting this reply. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 10:35, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Where? @Marcocapelle can you link it please GastonN'estPasBon (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:33, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Category:United States perennial candidates to Category:American perennial candidates – per C2E and C2D. I have never done this before so I am not sure if a redirect should be kept or not. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2026 (UTC)
- Category:Homes of United States Founding Fathers to Category:Houses of the Founding Fathers of the United States – C2D: Per Category:Houses in the United States and Founding Fathers of the United States. User:Namiba 18:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Disagree, these are the homes, places where the lived. Some are houses, others are log cabins, others differ from those. Please leave this category be, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:00, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
- Disagree, these are the homes, places where the lived. Some are houses, others are log cabins, others differ from those. Please leave this category be, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Category:12th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 12th century – C2C: Per subcats such as Maritime incidents in the 2000s. Please ping me if this should go the other way around... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Wait a minute! There are parent categories such as 12th-century disasters that fit the categories I just edited. Should I move this to CFD? The centuries, decades, and years with maritime incidents should be harmonized somehow... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:13, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- @OpalYosutebito: you are right, better discuss this in full CfD. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Category:15th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 15th century
- Category:16th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 16th century
- Category:17th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 17th century
- Category:18th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 18th century
- Category:19th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 19th century
- Category:20th-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 20th century
- Category:21st-century maritime incidents to Category:Maritime incidents in the 21st century
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Wait a minute! There are parent categories such as 12th-century disasters that fit the categories I just edited. Should I move this to CFD? The centuries, decades, and years with maritime incidents should be harmonized somehow... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:13, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Empty categories awaiting deletion
[edit]The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)