Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Charter
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Virgin Group. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 11:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Virgin Charter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company with little chance of expansion. Cloudbound (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable portion of Richard Branson's business portfolio Seasider91 (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Virgin Group. Notable as part of the list there if not on its own, a plausible redirect, and as always redirects are cheap (by some accounts, cheaper than deletion). - The Bushranger One ping only 21:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 21:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 21:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Virgin Group - we don't need separate pages for each branch or venture of the company. LaMona (talk) 06:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.