Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree fall
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE, WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Tree fall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unsourced and reads as if it was written as a joke. Here are some quotes that you may enjoy:
- "A person surviving a little tree falling is common, but surviving an extremely big tree is extremely rare"
- "Because when the tree falls it loses all its breathing, photosynthesis and other important stuff that trees have."
- " They should be planted with care and patience so that they get planted in the ground."
-I recommend deleting it and redirecting to blunt trauma Peter.C • talk • contribs 17:36, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 27. Snotbot t • c » 18:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - this unsourced essay could possibly be a hoax or joke, or may simply be a piece of juvenilia. Whatever it is, there is no rescuable content. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Chiswick Chap. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 18:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, no redirect. Chiswick said it all. It's at the very least original research; probably also somebody's idea of a joke. I'm surprised it lasted this long (2 months). --MelanieN (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No references, probably a joke. Nothing in this article is worth saving. It might be possible to write a sensible article on this subject, but it would be better to start from scratch. CodeTheorist (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.