Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick Perry II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Roderick Perry II

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Roderick Perry II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance. Debartolo2917 (talk) 05:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
• Keep. Passes WP:GNG, see this, this, and this. Alternatively, Draftify until he makes his NFL debut. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
• Weak keep or Draftify. Does have some coverage stemming from his college career as shown by BeanieFan11. A NFL debut alone won't make his case stronger unless somebody significantly covers his debut. Alvaldi (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
• Keep - passes GNG. Rlendog (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
• Keep- passes GNG with the sources provided by Beaniefan. No need to draftify as he is already has received WP:SIGCOV. Frank Anchor 20:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• keep there are good sources to pass WP:GNG. I'd like to see more detail in the article, but that's all about editing and isn't a deletion issue.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.