Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RB Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

RB Collection

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

RB Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

moved by the author from Draft without review at afc. It would't have passed if it had been reviewed, since it has insufficient sources for notability and is basically an advertisement DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: There is a lot of crossover between this article, another new article Automobile Corner of America which is also authored by Alruozzi, and content in Arbogast & Bastian#Legacy. AllyD (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. The article reads like an advertisement and is sourced to advertorials. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• Comment I certainly don’t believe that either of these two new articles by this user meet WP:GNG (hence why I moved them to draft space after they were submitted the first time), and I would have done the same if there wasn’t already a deletion discussion on the subject. But now that there is, I would certainly say to delete both articles. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.