Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25fa886b82c6c75

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenGL User Interface Library

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to OpenGL#Associated libraries. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 12:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)reply

OpenGL User Interface Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is “not notable and has no references.” Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me  ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me  ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me  ✍️ Contributions) 22:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)reply
  • Not perfect as the result may have undue weight compared to the other libraries in the section which have their own article, which either result in undue weight in an already longish target article which has its own issues which are possibly more important.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.