Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modacity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Modacity

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Modacity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company doesn't seem notable because it doesn't have enough coverage from independent sources. The sources found so far only briefly mention it, and checking WP:BEFORE shows the same pattern of passing mentions, photo credits, or sources published by its founder. This suggests it doesn't meet the criteria in WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS ^💬 19:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Netherlands. GSS ^💬 19:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
• Delete as failing NCORP. The duo behind the firm may pass NAUTHOR. I didn't check as the data in the article is not set up for such a change. Also, the sole incoming link is not substantial enough for a redirect. Remains delete. gidonb (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
• Delete as failing notability guidelines. Here are the sources:
  • this source only states subject being involved in the production of a video without anything in depth.
  • This source is primarily an interview, and so not independent.
  • this source is created by the founders of the subject so not secondary and independent. Stopped looking at sources from the same website as its articles that mentions the subject may be written by the founders. Same goes to this source
  • A Bloomberg piece that I didn't checked on may also be mentioning the subject so not in depth.
• By conclusion, the subject fails NCORP or GNG. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 06:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.