Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstallSimple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

InstallSimple

InstallSimple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page with no references, and I can't find anything to indicate it's anything but a small-time program. Primefac (talk) 20:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per G11: Unambiguous advertisement. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 22:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Comment While I'd advocate for deletion, this would be an abuse of the speedy deletion process, which is meant for only the most grave policy violations, not poorly written articles. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 21:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

You yourself has written, "While the article is indeed an advertisement [...]". That's all the qualification that G11 needs.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 22:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

You're right of course, I should have said "lacks a neutral point of view." It doesn't proclaim "buy this for $19.99 now!," it just lacks an objective viewpoint. In any case, I just hate seeing the speedy deletion process, already heavily abused, used anywhere but absolutely necessary. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  00:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  00:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Pure advert. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC).
• Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete While the article is indeed an advertisement, that's not really part of the criteria for deletion. If a subject can be verified from reliable sources and is notable, it stays, whatever the textual shortcomings might be. This has no such sources that I can find. --69.204.153.39 (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Vladislav Biryukov (talk) 00:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Hello. My name is Vladislav Biryukov I'm a main developer of the InstallSimple!

InstallSimple - the world's only program to create an installer that is written in assembly language. It is unique among its competitors, according to a compact size - just 120 kilobytes, instead of 10,20,30 megabytes of similar software analogs.

The program is developed for more than 8 years. And was downloaded over 500 000 times.

Article about the program was created on principle of articles about other applications. I improve the article and put link to a last review of the program. If necessary concrete changes, please let me know...

I am against the removal of article about this unique program!

Thank you! Regards, Vladislav Biryukov

• Delete Should have been speedy deleted G11. Either way delete per WP:PROMO. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - Actually, the above ip is incorrect. Promotional articles can be deleted for that very reason, if they have no redeeming qualities. Like this one. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.