Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspiration developer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Inspiration developer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any evidence that this is a notable concept. The search "inspiration developer" turns up nothing relevant. The piece is an essay, original research and synthesis from various sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - This seems to be some sort of promotion of a non-notable business concept in the form of an essay, as evidenced by the use of "we" and the business jargon. Pishcal — ♣ 21:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, a mix of original research and a non-notable neologism. Huon (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable, OR and neologism Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.