Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input processing instructions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Input processing instructions

Input processing instructions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article whose sole source I just removed as it was a predatory open access journal. Has been tagged since forever for notability, sourcing and orphan status. Guy (Help!) 18:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete apparently from its inventor → predatory journal →Wikipedia. No evidence of use of this term in any scholarly work and or teaching methods. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Trivial and mundane terminology. No evidence of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:N and GNG. Wikipedia is not a repository for indiscriminate information per WP:IINFO. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.