Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25f1542a8707089

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inferential programming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:42, 20 December 2025 (UTC)reply

Inferential programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. May fail WP:GNG. Even if this can be verified, this might be better covered in computer programming per WP:NOPAGE.4meter4 (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2025 (UTC)reply

Delete - Apart from what you mentioned, this also seems to fail WP:QUAL in my eyes. Furthermore, a quick online search seems to yield results that are essentially copies of the Wikipedia article, so this probably fails WP:GNG as you already mentioned. Oakchris1955 (talk) 09:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)reply
Keep There are academic sources discussing the topic, which is arguably a more formal definition for "vibe coding" which is a potential redirect target. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.