Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happn (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Happn

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Happn
• Articles for deletion/Happn(app)
• Articles for deletion/Happn (2nd nomination)

Happn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This application fails WP:PRODUCT. The coverage is only trivial coverage rather than significant and independent coverage. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 23:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Comment. @GeoffreyT2000: I don't have a vested interest one way or another in this article, but do you not consider a standalone article in the NYT significant coverage? --Kbabej (talk) 20:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Keep - This is a stub article, but contains sufficient secondary citations to meet the notability criteria of both WP:PRODUCT and WP:STUB in my opinion. Could do with some serious expansion, but does NOT meet the standard for deletion.

• Keep - WP:STUB; good references, short article. Just needs to be expanded. Operator873^CONNECT 00:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep – Meets WP:GNG as per a review of available sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per the comment from 99.162.153.185 (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happn:

  Meets WP:CORP from coverage , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

  The app has received international coverage in publications based in Australia, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States including this review in The New York Times. The article is neutrally written:

  happn is a mobile dating application developed by FTW & Co. The application is compatible with Android, iPhone, and Windows. The app uses a feed based upon the location of users' phone, listing possible matches. In July 2014, the app had 40,000 daily users. In January 2016, happn had 10 million users.

  Cunard (talk) 07:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.