Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FromUz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator Admrboltz (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- FromUz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article. Failed Prod and Speedy, created and edited by two COI users. Tried to find reliable sources, none located from my Google and GN searches. Admrboltz (talk) 19:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. This nomination is premature, in that it was made within two minutes of my contesting the speedy deletion tag, while I was still editing the article to add sources such as and . How about giving people a chance to improve articles rather than having this mad rush to delete as quickly as possible? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - It is sourced, contains more information than a lot of articles, and it is 100% encyclopedic content. I see no reason why to delete it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.