Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45b6ed738aea40c

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First things

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to First Things. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:03, 5 March 2018 (UTC)reply

First things (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a reasonable disambiguation article; I can find nothing that attests to the usage of "first things" to refer to things Jesus said, and it's not included in the linked page (which is a redirect to Jesus). power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 06:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  • Delete and possibly redirect to First Things SportingFlyer (talk) 07:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)reply
  • Comment: The idea behind rejecting disambiguation comes about from cases where there is a term and it has only one meaning. Therefore redirects are only of the simple spelling-correction form. But that argument is inaccurate in this case, that "first things" is a journal and only that, is clearly false, as the name of the journal has prior art in the religious expression "first things," its expository definition which links to related terms, and some other specific (literal) uses, mostly in relation to the original term (religion and moral philosophy). -Inowen (talk) 05:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment after reviewing the article with additional edits, I still fail to see how this is a proper disambiguation page. The only article that's a blue link that would need to be disambiguated would be the journal. SportingFlyer (talk) 05:55, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete and Redirect - per SportingFlyer. Isingness (talk) 06:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.