Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FinStack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

FinStack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

FinStack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable topics, not pass WP:ORG and seems like as WP:PROMO or WP:ADVERT or WP:SPAM and the editor decleared creator have Conflict of Interest with this company. Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 13:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and India. Cptabhiimanyuseven •[@píng mє] 13:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: PROMO, sourcing is primary or non-RS. All I could find was for a guild for Albion Online (video game), or funding announcments . Oaktree b (talk) 14:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  Hi, please try to understand that this page is not related to the Amsterdam company you’re referring to.

  This page refers to an Indian banking software company.

  Owing to your geographical location, you may not be getting the right search results. Which is exactly the purpose of this article - to add information to the internet in factual and non promotional manner. Gauravagarwal28 (talk) 16:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

  That's even more proof that this isn't a notable company; "adding information to the internet" is what we consider PROMO. It helps search rankings among other things. If you have reliable sources to share that we can't find, please do so. The ones now in the article aren't enough/sufficient to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Technology, Karnataka, and Delaware. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:18, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Per Oaktree b. The article currently cites portfolios and similar links as references. There's no reliable sourcing that's independent of the subject. Encyclopaedic notability cannot be established. And yes, it reads like a PROMO. Retro music11 (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete – Per above. Svartner (talk) 02:21, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - nothing unique to add beyond what's already been said. Dgbombay (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – The subject does not meet WP:CORP. Mysecretgarden (talk) 13:32, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete This is obviously promotional and non-notable. MightyRanger (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
• Delete junk non-notable WP:PROMO. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 01:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.