Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a454196d1e33879c

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filemobile

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)reply

Filemobile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was authored in 2010 with disclosure given that interested parties had created the article. The article is primarily supported with outdated company "press releases." The company is an entrepreneurial endeavor that has gone through several reorganisations and renamings. The current name seems to be newspark.io. There is nothing to suggest to me that the company was notable and thus this non-encyclopedia article (marketing) has never been updated. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)reply

Crowdspark: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
New Spark: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  • Delete: Originally posted as a COI article setting out the company's origins and business proposition at 2010. The company's inclusion in various lists around that time would now fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Articles on the acquiring company Newzulu were twice speedy-deleted as promotional so that doesn't provide an WP:ATD target. Whether under its earlier or current ownership or business propositions, I am not seeing evidence that the firm has attained notabilty. AllyD (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.