Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCExtractor Development
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- CCExtractor Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While their program CCExtractor does appear to be widely used, other than tech forums, tutorials, or pages affiliated with the organization, I was unable to find enough significant reliable coverage for either the organization or its programs. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Couldn't find any sources that establish the notability of the company. It's more likely, in fact, that we'll get enough sources to write an article on CCExtractor itself before we get enough for the company, so I'd recommend focusing on writing an article about that subject instead. Enterprisey (talk!) 04:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I searched and couldn't find notability either. Level C (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.