Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

31 July 2026

To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.

Guide to deletion

Born in the USA (radio show)

Born in the USA (radio show) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very old article since 2007 with no references or notability. A search on Google comes up with nothing Majash2020 (talk) 06:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related AfD discussions. Majash2020 (talk) 06:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Staraction (talk · contribs) 13:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

St. Francis Anglo-Indian Girls School

St. Francis Anglo-Indian Girls School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some non-independent ROUTINE coverages and directories, but no SIGCOV in RS to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Carmel Garden Matriculation Higher Secondary School

Carmel Garden Matriculation Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded some non-independent ROUTINE coverages in a local newspaper and some directories, but no SIGCOV in RS to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Suguna PIP School

Suguna PIP School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE yielded a number of ROUTINE reportages about board exam results and some directories, but no RS with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Tamil Nadu. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Jahking Guillory

Jahking Guillory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Leaning toward deletion based on lack of enough WP:SIGCOV but it feels on the cusp. These three sources, however, contan something beyond brief mentions ([1], [2], [3]) may be enough to keep the article, what do you think? —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 12:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 12:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - first source you linked to doesn't appear to have anything about him, but Deadline (syndicated by Yahoo there, but it's Deadline), IndieWire, both have good sigcov. I also like this one, this one from PopSugar, etc. I also like NACTOR for him - Kicks, Hard Miles, and Five Points are all notable productions where he played major roles. Jishara (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Marko Jović

Marko Jović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems this Marko Jović played four league matches in Rad before spending his entire career. Neither of the two secondary sources, SOS Kanal (archived) and Večernje novosti, mention him in detail. Corresponding article on Serbian Wikipedia likewise provided the exact same references as here. WP:BEFORE is difficult because this name is so common in the Balkans, even in Serbian (Марко Јовић). ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Cities: Skylines - Snowfall

Cities: Skylines - Snowfall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Cities: Skylines because topic is not notable as an independent article. See MOS:VGDLC, WP:NGAME, and WP:GNG.

I am also nominating:

Cities: Skylines - After Dark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for the same reason.

Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related AfD discussions. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Courtesy ping: NewAccount7295. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 12:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

86LOVE

86LOVE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable independent sources with sufficient coverage to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Azerbaijan Person of the Year

Azerbaijan Person of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of any notability for this list or award. Yousiphh (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related AfD discussions. Yousiphh (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Awards. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

List of museums and colleges with mastodon fossils on display

List of museums and colleges with mastodon fossils on display (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NLIST, it's essentially science based WP:CRUFT. Lavalizard101 (talk) WP:SOLIDARITY 11:38, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Science, and Lists. Lavalizard101 (talk) WP:SOLIDARITY 11:38, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per MOS:LISTPURP. Mastadon fossils are something many people will be interested in, particularly school kids, so I do not believe this is WP:CRUFT. I don't think there is any question that the museums are notable, and almost all seem to be sourced. I don't see a strong reason to delete this, it is primarily a navigation list.Ldm1954 (talk) 12:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  The museums are notable, I never claimed otherwise. I just don't think the list itself is notable, A museum having a mastodon fossil is not a defining feature in-and-of-itself hence its WP:CRUFT to collate this as a list. Lavalizard101 (talk) WP:SOLIDARITY 12:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - agree w/ above that this looks like an information or navigation list to me (is structured, most entries linked), so NLIST wouldn't need to be met (grouping seems to fail it per quick Ggl query), rather only usefulness to readers :) - Asdfjrjjj (talk) 13:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Calls for autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh

Calls for autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article into Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.

This article primarily documents the political and constitutional developments that followed the 2019 revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status, including calls for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood, demands for the restoration of Article 370, and Ladakh's demands for statehood, Sixth Schedule protections and other constitutional safeguards. These developments are all part of the broader aftermath of the 2019 reorganisation, which is already the subject of the proposed target article.

Rather than constituting a single, independently defined topic, the current article combines several related but distinct movements and political demands. Much of the material is better presented as a summary of the post-2019 political aftermath within the parent article, with links to any standalone articles where appropriate.

Per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and WP:CFORK, merging would improve organization, reduce content forks, and avoid maintaining parallel coverage of closely related events while preserving any unique, well-sourced material. Wikipicked (talk) 02:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose the article covers topics that predates the revocation of the special status and is largely different from people opposing or supporting the revocation, the article covers the calls for autonomy in j and k & L not the people opposing or supporting the revocation of article 370 the nominater list's wiki polies but fails to go in depth of the polices the policy I'm referring to is:

  WP:SIZERULE which states article sized more than 15,000 words should be "Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed." the Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir is approxmatly 20000 the article itself should be divided not have articles merged into it. Sarim Wani (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  I agree that article size is prolly' worth keeping in mind, but my nomination is not on the length of the target article.

  Concern here is that much of this page covers the political developments following the 2019 reorganisation. I think that material fits more naturally as part of the broader coverage of the revocation and the aftermath, with the main article summarising the relevant content where appropriate.

  If the target article is considered too long, that can be addressed separately by restructuring it as needed. I don't think the current size of the target article, by itself, is a reason to retain a separate article covering substantially the same subject. For that reason, I still think a merge is the better outcome. Wikipicked (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  SIZERULE does not apply when you have taken political manifesto and demand documents and reproduced them here in a manner that thoroughly violates WP:NOFULLTEXT and MOS:QUOTE. UnpetitproleX (talk) 15:12, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose: The subject is well notable for its own article and the size of the target article absolutely matters when thinking of a merge. Content forks themselves are never an issue; they only become an issue when the content is redundant or the fork has been done for POV pushing, neither of which applies to this article. — EarthDude (Talk) 14:12, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge to Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir: The article is mostly content which violates WP:NOFULLTEXT and is WP:POVFORK which would be better addressed in the revocation article, under a section called "Demands for restoration of autonomy." The article has five sections: three (i.e. Background, government response and national party positions) are simply unnecessary WP:FORKs of the revocation article (the political positions one is also a POVFORK because it includes only supporters, whereas on the revocation article we have both supporters and opposers), and the remaining two sections (political demands and NGO demands sections, the lengthiest part of the article and the main reason for the "long length" being referred to by others) are nearly entirely unoriginal word by word full length copy-paste reproductions of political manifestoes and demand documents, and thus violate NOFULLTEXT in addition to being WP:POV. Anything original and salvageable should be merged into the revocation article in a NPOV manner under a new section or sub-section. UnpetitproleX (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  • Comment @UnpetitproleX Has appeared to have misunderstood what I had said WP:SIZERULE is being talked with regards to Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir not Calls for autonomy in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh pleas clarify what do you mean by "simply unnecessary WP:FORKs of the revocation article" those are not copies of the article, WP:RELAR is in order here, and the claim that those are "political manifestoes and demand documents" is simply untrue if the political manifesto word is used according to you're definition than all the laws ever passed in parliament are manifestoes, demand documents is a legal termology not applicable here the correct word to use is a resolution (Personal attack removed) Wikipedia is a neutral source of encyclopedic media. (Personal attack removed) Sarim Wani (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

    poisoning the well is certainly a bold choice to go with, but I reckon that won't go very far since attacking other editors is not allowed. I will wait for you to strike them out before I remove them myself. If you believe there is misconduct then please present evidence at the appropriate forum.

    The semantical argument about manifesto/demand vs resolution is futile since the distinction (which, in this case, I doubt exists) is irrelevant. You've now removed a large section of those copy-paste reproductions but it still retains way too much to not be considered violative of MOS:QUOTE and also WP:SOAPBOX.

    I grant, though, that I didn't realise you were referring to the revocation article's size. But the revocation article itself is unduly inflated. It is badly written in parts, dwells upon the personal opinions of individuals far too much (the lengthy paragraph containing several direct quotes from Shah Faesal, for instance, is undue), is written like news in large parts of some sections and should definitely be trimmed.

    Coming back to this article, it is still mostly WP:POVFORK. The title itself is POV, and the way the article is written doesn't help its case. UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Apart from the POVFORK concerns above, I also note that the article combines several disparate demands for disparate forms of "autonomy" into one single essay. Within Kashmir you have two demands: first a vague "autonomy" to "safeguarded the identity, culture, and rights" which may or may not involve a restoration of article 370, and second specifically about restoration of article 370 (restoration of statehood being common to both). In Ladakh there is one demand, that of 6th schedule and statehood, opposed to a reintegration with J&K, or a return to the article 370 situation. In Jammu there is one demand, separate statehood to Jammu after bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir (this last demand is conspicuously missing from the article, which only further illustrates to me that this article is a POVFORK). The article combines two of these disparate demands into one in a manner which is WP:SYNTH. UnpetitproleX (talk) 18:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:35, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Asyndeton

Asyndeton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Polysyndeton because expanding this article (i.e. adding rhetorical use and effect) would lead to overlap; additionally, much of the articles are composed of examples which could be combined (and split by headers)— if merged, I am willing to compile the information together. See here for example of a merged rhetorical device page SavageSquad67 (talk) 04:36, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

The following article could be nominated as well

Syndeton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Language-related AfD discussions. SavageSquad67 (talk) 04:36, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There is also Syndeton, which I gather might be subject to the same rationale. @SavageSquad67: Would you like to see all three articles merged, or is there a reason to keep the unmarked version separate? Cnilep (talk) 04:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  ResponseThat is a great point, @Cnilep:: previously, I had commented that syndeton would be included in the merger, and I now would like to retract that statement. While polysyndeton and asyndeton both refer to rhetorical devices, syndeton is a grammatical concept which would be weird discussing side-by-side with rhetorical devices (especially regarding listing examples and rhetorical use). Instead, syndeton should, in my opinon, be kept seperate (though the page may have some minor discussion of the syndeton).
  I would argue anyone who was looking for an article about how the syndeton works would find learning about rhetorical devices unhelpful and vice versa (P.S.: I don't know what I'm talking about, please correct me if I'm wrong).
  TLDR : Rhetorical and grammatical concepts should be kept seperate

  SavageSquad67 (talk) 7:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  SavageSquad67 FYI the AfD tag is still on the article. FaviFake (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  FaviFakeI tried to remove it and Wikipedia would not let me. If someone has the ability to remove it they may, but for now I believe it is fine in case it is decided syndeton should actually be merged. SavageSquad67 (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. None of WP:MERGEREASON applies. The closest is "4. Context" ("in order to better serve reader understanding.") But the articles are perfectly understandable independently. --Altenmann >talk 14:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Bärbel Richter

Bärbel Richter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article does not meet the notability criteria at WP:SPORTCRIT; specifically they have not been the subject of significant coverage by multiple published non-trivial secondary sources. The reference supplied only proves that the subject exists and competed, not that they should have a WP article. Masato.harada (talk) 15:14, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Masato.harada (talk) 15:14, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
• What East German newspapers did you search for coverage for on this multi-time WORLD champion in the offline era? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:03, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Ambassador Airways

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ambassador Airways
• Articles for deletion/Ambassador Airways (2nd nomination)

Ambassador Airways (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short lived charter airline (operated for less than 18 months) with sources that simply confirm "it existed" and not why it is notable. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related AfD discussions. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:15, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related AfD discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:10, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this survived the last nomination in November in part because of sources identified at the time and added to the article (before then, it was apparently unsourced entirely) but apparently proved to not be enough to avoid renomination (and even at that time there were concerns by another commenter that two of those sources weren't actually SIGCOV anyway), but also in part because of assertions that there might be more–which normally don't fly at AfD anymore (especially in the stricter standards of 2026, and especially for companies, we need to know exactly what those sources are, and we need to know now). No specific opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:31, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – In the previous nomination, I presented three sources. Out of the three, (Shaw 1994) and (Woodley 2016) were the best ones in my opinion, providing significant secondary coverage, establishing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. It doesn't really matter how short of a lifespan the airline had as it received the necessary coverage. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 08:09, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:53, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Weingarten rights

Weingarten rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc. because the concept of Weingarten rights is adequately covered on the lawsuit article and in greater detail.

If there were multiple Supreme Court cases about this matter, then perhaps it would make sense to have a separate article covering the concept in general. But since there is just this one, let's just keep it to the main article. Sjedits (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 06:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Support per nom. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 13:11, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

L.A.P.D.: To Protect and to Serve

L.A.P.D.: To Protect and to Serve (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not finding any WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. If more sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 13:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Crime. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 13:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I didn't find anything in Newspapers.com. The reviews section is likely going to be what makes or breaks this. The news source from the Jersey Journal is likely good, but we need another 1-2 good sources (ideally reviews) to really push this. Spinegrinder could be good depending on the length of the mention, as the review length kind of differs in that book. The Spicer source is way too brief to really count towards notability, as it's more of a trivial mention. The Pratley source looks to potentially be a capsule review. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

  Looks like there might have been a review in Film-Dienst. I can't verify how extensive the review is offhand. Offhand I'm leaning towards recommending this redirect to Madsen's filmography. What I am finding shows that he's the main person associated with this. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:38, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 06:13, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Christian Fong

Christian Fong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-time candidate for office (who ended his campaign before the primary) and businessman who has not received significant coverage in either endeavor. The article is extremely self-promotional and reads like a resume. It could possibly be redirected to 2010 Iowa gubernatorial election, but given that he didn't actually run in the election, that feels less intuitive. PA Uploader (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Colorado, and Iowa. PA Uploader (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: It appears there is a different Christian Fong who is a professor in political science: National Affairs 2026,CNBC 2024, University of Michigan 2023 (not independent) 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib)
• Delete: I don't see anything beyond press releases in Google beyond and a few mentions of the gubernatorial run. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 21:18, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep, per [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] and more. The article needs work, but subject meets WP:GNG. Ighs (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

In looking through those sources, I respectfully disagree. I don't see him mentioned in the Forbes piece at all. 3 of the pieces are standard pieces written about virtually every candidate, 1 is a press release from a presidential campaign, and 1 is an Wentry on a blog. For an unsuccessful candidate for office, I don't believe that would be enough. PA Uploader (talk) 12:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect - candidates for political office are not automatically notable, although a redirect might be appropriate to the election article. The offered additional sources are unreliable: press releases, blogs, and, as I've written before, "Forbes is a crust of a shell of a carcass of a formerly reliable source." Bearian (talk) 02:15, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Views are split between keeping, merging or deleting. More discussion required.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Temple milestones (LDS Church)

Temple milestones (LDS Church) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:BLAR so bringing a proposal to redirect to List of temples (LDS Church). This page is a clear WP:CONTENTFORK of List of temples (LDS Church), with the addition of a couple of columns in the table that could, if editorial consensus allowed, be added to the table at the proposed target. (I personally think the list violates WP:NOTTRIVIA and appears to be a work of original research since I don't see an independent source that compiles all this data in a single place, but inclusion of content on another page is an editorial discussion for that page.) This page, meanwhile, is simply a fork of another similar topic and per WP:NOPAGE should not exist as a standalone page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Lists. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Per my response on my talk page:

This was part of Comparison of temples (LDS Church) before the page got too large to show in full, and the primary trigger to why the page was split. These tables are not new, but the location is. Feel free to let me know if there's a better way to show this information.

The final table wasn't fully shown on the old page due to memory size issue which is why the page triggered a split, creating this page as a result. That has fixed the issue.

The content of the tables is nearly 100 percent pulled from a standard template that is used by multiple pages to fill in information. The template content used in infoboxes, tables, and other content across various pages. The content could probably be better referenced within the various temple templates as the content is unable to be individually referenced within the page. The presentation and purpose of the content is not the same in each list.

List of temples (LDS Church) is limited to only show latest milestones, excluds past rededications, and only allows comparing temples in the same status section, by that status milestone, while this one compares all temples by any milestone. Likewise, it shows limited sortable size characteristics and not other info that the other table in Comparison of temples (LDS Church) provide. List of temples (LDS Church) has a different purpose and was never meant to be a replacement of what these tables provide and vice versa.

If it needs to remerge, it needs to be remerged into Comparison of temples (LDS Church) and not List of temples (LDS Church). The memory size issue will also need to be addressed before merging. If it needs to be retitled "comparison of temple milestones (LDS church) or if you have any other suggestion, let me know.

-Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 15:51, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

I can't imagine that Comparison of temples (LDS Church) is appropriate as a page either (it seems to be a pile of OR and trivia and to violate WP:NOTDATABASE). Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

If not a page, what would you suggest? What space outside of mainspace will be most appropriate?

While not referenced, information is verifiable. However, WP:NOTDATABASE does clarify that even verifiable information does not mean suitable content for Wikipedia. The question is it suitable or notable for wikipedia standards.

There's pages that compare religious structures size, height, architectural content, etc. The information is pertinent to the architectural aspects and when significant milestones was reached for each structure.

Even though this page has been on Wikipedia mainspace for about 20 years, used and edited by several users over that time, I do not know of any "grandfather clause" that would allow any page to stay if it's deemed to fall short of the standard. In all that time, there seems to have been no challenge to the notability for this page under any grounds, and it may be more reason for it to be challenged to get a full discussion.

- Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Discussion in 2009 for the parent page, which is now titled "Comparison of temples (LDS Church)" per WP:CONCISE, had a resulting consensus of Keep. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Per discussion, these two lists were two different types of lists. Merging would effectively make the "list" page a "comparison" page. See Template:LDS Temple/ for different extant lists of temples. - Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Right, but now the temple milestones page is a fork of either of these lists. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok. Remerge into Comparison of temples (LDS Church)? If remerged, any suggestion on how to handle the memory issue? I reduced the number of columns on the first table which allows more to be shown (geographic comparison better compared in geographic comparison page), but the memory issue still prohibits all templates to be viewed if recombined.

As for the "fork" issue, I'm not understanding "fork" issue. The scope is not the same. But even if it was, where does it contradict (which would cause violation)? The source data is the same - it automatically changes with the source. There's links to edit the source, but it can't be changed within the page (which would cause conflict).

This page was created without discussion via bold split WP:PROSPLIT because of display issues due to size already prohibiting content to be seen (see WP:INCLUDELIMIT). However, I did unintentionally failed to perform item 4 in step 5 which I'll rectify. - Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Dclemens1971 Please explain how this is classified as unacceptable content fork for either page. I'm not seeing this which is why I asked. - Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 12:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

I think the WP:CONTENTFORK issue is quite clear:

• List of temples (LDS Church) has a table listing the temples' operating status; floor and site areas; dedication date; and dedicating official.
• Comparison of temples (LDS Church) has a table listing the temples' operating status; floor and site areas; building height; numbers of baptistries, endowment rooms, and sealing rooms; architectural style; designer; and whether there is a visitor center.
• Temple milestones (LDS Church) has a table listing the temples' operating status; date of announcement; announcing official; date of groundbreaking; groundbreaking official; date of open house; dedication date; dedicating official; and current president.

There is also List of temples by geographic region (LDS Church) and List of temples in the United States (LDS Church). But as to the redirection discussion, I simply cannot believe that three separate lists (each of which requires separate maintenance to remain accurate) are required to document this information, much of which overlaps and much of which is trivia. What is the navigational purpose of being able to sort temples by the date they held an open house or whether they have a visitor center? Have you supplied any source independent from the LDS Church that covers this information as required per WP:NLIST? Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:49, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Dclemens1971, In definition, it's clarly stated "Transclusions are not content forks." Most information on this page is transclusions. Outside an occasional temple announcement, causing a need for an extra template reference, there's minimal updating needed for this page. Outside of adding a row for each new announcement everything else is updated automatically. If an announced temple has a groundbreaking, open house, dedication or a new temple president is called, the information is automatically updated. Infoboxes, list pages, etc. uses the same source data. This makes conflicts practically an impossibility which is what would make it a negative WP:CONTENTFORK. The way the data is sourced makes it easy to maintain current info over multiple pages. This page focus on milestones. If information needs to be updated/changed, it could simply be done via the "edit" link found next to each temple name, and the edit will effect all pages using that field.

I'm not sure how it violates WP:NOPAGE, it was formed by WP:PROSPLIT. I brought this split to your attention prior to you posting "articles for deletion". This content already on main space for years on a page already determined to meet notability requirements. This table content is no longer on the previous page because it was a split. Outside of temple identification, List of temples (LDS Church) duplicates only one field out of the tables in this page.

Per the referencing issue, there's a separate banner and I've created a comment section and I've added some referencing on my own in effort to address this issue. The referencing issue is within the template and effects ALL pages using these temple templates. Some data are referenced in other fields in the template as that field can't support text. While I wish editors would add more, there are a number independent sources listed within this page (Salt Lake Tribune, various local media, etc).

You seem to have an issue with WP:NOTTRIVIA with certain column(s) in various pages, and not this page as a whole. As shown in its title, the focus of the page is temple milestones which reflects most columns which is why I chose this wording (the tables and columns headers are the same as it was before the move). These are significant milestone events with these event significance explained in the page. You seem to have an issue with a particular column(s) in and outside this page. This can be addressed in the respective page's Talk page as even if there's an issue to that column, it does not disqualify the page as a whole.

- Thanks. Dmm1169 (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Halta

Halta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Old article since 2011 with no references or suitable notability. Searches online bring Helta, a seperate location in Lebanon. Majash2020 (talk) 08:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related AfD discussions. Majash2020 (talk) 08:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Obviously notable even just from current news coverage. For example:

Video: Lebanese villagers describe life under Israeli control in Halta (June 21, 2026)

Halta Center

Israel’ Raids Southern Lebanon’s Halta, One Martyred (March 2026)

Lebanese media: Israeli forces are moving towards the town of Halta in southern Lebanon (March 23, 2026) Tiamut (talk) 18:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Life under Israeli occupation inside Lebanon's 'yellow line' (June 5, 2026)

Israeli fire targets Naqoura and outskirts of Halta (December 17, 2024)

Lebanon’s Arkoub Residents: We’re Not Leaving Our Land (note Halta is one of seven towns in the Arkoub region) Tiamut (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Shujaat Khan (engineer)

Shujaat Khan (engineer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Basically a WP:PROMO created by a WP:COI. Non-notable local activist. Longhornsg (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Education, Religion, Islam, Bangladesh, and New York. Longhornsg (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable and not neutral. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 13:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Bhavan's Vidya Mandir, Irinjalakuda

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Bhavan's Vidya Mandir, Irinjalakuda
• Articles for deletion/Bhavan's Vidya Mandir, Irinjalakuda (2nd nomination)

Bhavan's Vidya Mandir, Irinjalakuda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Only primary source provided. Since last AfD in 2016 we no longer grant inherent notability to high schools. LibStar (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Kerala. LibStar (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Ma Hunkel

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ma Hunkel
• Articles for deletion/Ma Hunkel (2nd nomination)

Ma Hunkel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Red Tornado; I'm not sure the character would pass WP:GNG all on her own and her page is nothing but plot summaries and a list of her appearances in other media.

To be specific, there's two ways to merge the characters; one is to treat the Red Tornado page as a composite page but I'm not sure how relevant she is to have such a weight. Another is to add her to "Other versions" under a sub-heading of "Ma Hunkel" that basically has the intro,some of the fictional biography, and powers and abiltiies. Granted, the Red Tornado page itself also needs quite a bit of re-tweaking. CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related AfD discussions. CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

EDIT: I did not realize this page has already been nominated for deletion prior (it seems to have been for simply that instead of merging). So in merging this, the Red Tornado page will also have to be tweaked to include Ma Hunkel more prominently.CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

I changed my mind on this. I acted too prematurely not knowing the sources too deeply and forgot to check if the page has been through a deletion process before. CosmicMordecai (talk)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Net Optics

Net Optics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Ixia because it doesnt seem notable. it has been totally defunct for over a decade and what little info is on this page seems mostly fluff and nonsense Jackjd0 (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Red Tornado (character)

Red Tornado (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Red Tornado; This page here is very redundant and is a good example of a WP:CFORK. This page seems to exists so somehow, the second version can take precedent and for Ma Hunkel to be somewhere that calls her "Red Tornado". CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related AfD discussions. CosmicMordecai (talk) 04:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Duane Sand

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Duane Sand
• Articles for deletion/Duane Sand (2nd nomination)

Duane Sand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quasi-perennial unsuccessful candidate for office who has not received significant coverage in any of his campaigns. The extent of coverage he's received has been fairly typical. The last nomination from 2011 resulted in no consensus, but given tighter standards today, this seems worth revisiting. No obvious redirect target, either. PA Uploader (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and North Dakota. PA Uploader (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. This article does not pass WP:NPOL. Aneirinn (talk) 04:26, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Michael Richard Bell

Michael Richard Bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Marked for notability concerns since 2013. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bilateral relations, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: This is basically an unsourced BLP. I haven't even checked for sources, this just isn't the article we should have. Ping me if anyone saves it. MediaKyle (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. To be fair, this was created at a different time in Wikipedia's policy evolution — once upon a time, diplomats were considered "inherently" notable so long as it was possible to verify that they existed, regardless of whether they could actually pass WP:GNG on their sourceability or not. That's long since been deprecated, however, and now a diplomat requires GNG-worthy reliable source coverage and doesn't get an article at all anymore if he can't be shown to have that. Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: no valid secondary sources to prove GNG --TitCrisse (t•c) 11:58, 26 July 2026 (UTC).
• Delete - poorly sourced; one link is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Whilst I appreciate the sourcing is terrible and there doesn't seem to be a great deal online about him, I personally think that it is common sense that anyone who was ambassador to the USSR/Russia, one of the prime diplomatic postings in the world, should be considered notable. @Bearian, MediaKyle, Bearcat, and TitCrisse: I have added a link to his obituary (he died in 2021, so this is not a BLP incidentally). -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Got it. I'm moving into the neutral zone. Bearian (talk) 09:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow folks to respond to Necrothesp's. query
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Dmitry Gorin

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Dmitry Gorin
• Articles for deletion/Dmitry Gorin (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Dmitry Gorin (3rd nomination)

Dmitry Gorin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not pass WP:GNG as it does not contain significant coverage from independent reliable sources about the subject. Neither does it pass WP:NBIO or WP:NACADEMIC. The only sources that do not have a passing mention of the subject are not independent or read like a paid-for editorial. This article was most recently nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry G. Gorin and the article had said they were a Los Angeles County District Attorney, however the subject never held that position. Aneirinn (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, Russia, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:13, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:10, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Indpur Goenka High School

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Indpur Goenka High School
• Articles for deletion/Indpur Goenka High School (2nd nomination)

Indpur Goenka High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and West Bengal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this article survived the first nomination in 2015 under the lower standards in this topic area of that era–which boiled down to "it exists", an argument that does not really fly at AfD nowadays. (No opinion of if this meets 2026 standards.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:13, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Indpur#Education, where it's mentioned, as an ATD-R. Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:42, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Lake Montfort School, Virgonagar

Lake Montfort School, Virgonagar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Christianity, and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of schools in Bengaluru, where it's mentioned, as an ATD-R. Additional searches didn't yield anything useful to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:51, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Panchavati

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Panchavati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:47, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:18, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas#Karnataka, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Ride the Wild Wind

Ride the Wild Wind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Innuendo (album) because the article fails WP:NSONG. Charted #1 in Poland but no other significant coverage. One chart position is not enough to establish notability. Mika1h (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England. Mika1h (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - Found this list entry: [10], though I still think it's below notability criteria. --Mika1h (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Innuendo (album). Notability aside, the article currently does not contain enough material to warrant a stand-alone article per WP:PAGEDECIDE (especially not enough properly sourced material...). Ping me if the article is expanded, and I'll re-evaluate. TompaDompa (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. I think that the linked source just about pushes it into notability. Velociraptor888 (talk) 23:58, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

St. Cyprian Catholic Church (Philadelphia)

St. Cyprian Catholic Church (Philadelphia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:RUNOFTHEMILL church that is lacking in content and notability. Red0ctober22 (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Pennsylvania. Red0ctober22 (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Weak delete - arguably notable as 102 years old, but I don't see significant coverage. Ping me if you find anything more. Bearian (talk) 02:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  I don't think its age necessarily provides notability. The city of Philadelphia is flooded with 100+ year old Catholic churches, the overwhelming majority of which do not have their own articles. You could argue that's an example of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but I just want to point it out. Red0ctober22 (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Peesh ili luzhesh season 4

Peesh ili luzhesh season 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced. Previously moved to Draft:Peesh ili luzhesh season 4 and recreated without improvements. If it can be improved, the draft is there. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Television. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:28, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Games-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:05, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• This article was created just yesterday; it's possible the creator was planning on adding sources to it soon. However, they really should have added the sources to the article before publishing it. I'm sure the sources exist, and as such I will go draftify here to give the creator more time to find them and add them in. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 14:49, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Gommeh - As explained in the nomination, an identical draft already exists. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:14, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Then there's really not a good reason to keep this in article space now, since it's clearly not ready yet. In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 11:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Piešťany Military History Museum

Piešťany Military History Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The first source is from their website. The second source is a user made article from an encyclopedia. The third source is an Slovokian version of tripadvisor. There is barely anything on the web, news and books. If there are srouces this article can be kept. SVcode(Talk) 17:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Slovakia. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:38, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment A quick check on Google Maps shows that this museum has a huge collection of aircraft, albeit not in great condition. I suspect that there will be reasonable coverage in Slovak language sources. Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@Nick-D: There's only two other languages, Slovak and Vietnamese. Vietnamese uses the same sources as Slovak, and Slovak only has two sources. One of the sources is the museum's official website while the other source is an encyclopedia who uses museum's official website as a source. This leaves only the primary source. I also searched it up on the web using site:.sk, and only found TripAdvisor-like websites. SVcode(Talk) 21:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Shady Grove, Illinois

Shady Grove, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place is a unincorporated community VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 18:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - This source (p.15) says Shady Grove had a filling station and 40 dwellings. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per @Magnolia677. The current state of the article is bad and needs to be fixed. Khalitate (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 21:29, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 03:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Parikhanim Mikayilgizi

Parikhanim Mikayilgizi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacking in-depth secondary source coverage to meet WP:NBIO. Yousiphh (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related AfD discussions. Yousiphh (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Poetry, and Azerbaijan. Shellwood (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

New Columbia, Illinois

New Columbia, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE, Sourced only the unreliable GNIS database. No evidence that this place is a unincorporated community. VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 18:34, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:38, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:36, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Body hopping

Body hopping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GN. The refs cited are for films where body hopping happens. --Altenmann >talk 03:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: This is conceptually far too ill defined, and far too vague for a Wikipedia Page, making it fail WP:WWIN. It's essentially Possession, but it doesn't contain any useful content that would even justify considering a merger. Also, as per nom, fails WP:GN, and also fails any kind of source based test. Foxtrot620 (talk) 03:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Passes WP:GN due to coverage in reliable sources, such as https://reactormag.com/five-sci-fi-stories-about-body-hopping/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-42498-63 (talk) 06:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
  • This source is exactly the kind as our wikipedia page is: just a collection of stories about body hopping, i.e., there is no critical analysis the subject in depth (as required by WP:GNG): properties, typical scenarios, who was the first to use this trick, etc. Compare "Magic ring" "Robinsonade", "isekai", etc..--Altenmann >talk 07:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
    • @Altenmann: Then what about "Body Hopping: A Thought Experiment"? Daranios (talk) 10:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Viraj Jan Party

Viraj Jan Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Fails NORG and GNG Thilsebatti (talk) 02:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Rajasthan. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with Rajasthan as there's not enough coverage for it to clear WP:GNG guidelines and it does not require a separate Wiki article.Farhanansari1994 (talk) 07:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Montfort Inter College

Montfort Inter College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since previous AfD we are now much stricter on high schools. Only a primary source provided. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Uttar Pradesh. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: that first nomination from 2007 was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahanagar Boys' Inter College Lucknow (the article was renamed in 2018 to reflect a name change for the institution itself). In any event, the concerns back then were more about cleanup issues than notability, even considering the lower standards of 19 years ago. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Kherajkhat College

Kherajkhat College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Assam. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

John Chidley-Hill

John Chidley-Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of the sources used are self-published and being used to back up claims in the article, which is written like a resume. Prior to this nomination, one of the sources used was the subject's resume (I removed it from the page prior to realizing the rest of the sources were almost all self-published). It is clear that the subject has done a lot of writing however, I am not seeing WP:N being met. Covering hundreds of events does not equal notability. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate your thoughtful editing! The sources now in the piece are primarily published via The Canadian Press, not the subject himself, so the information gleaned is via the subject's work. I believe the length and breadth of the career does warrant some notability. Outro (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Jobra High School

Jobra High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Equality Matters

Equality Matters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived public relations initiative with WP:ROUTINE coverage by non-independent sources and non-RS. Lacks WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NORG. No need for unncessary fragmentation. Merge into parent org Media Matters for America. Longhornsg (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media, LGBTQ+ studies, Politics, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Media Matters for America. Very little significant coverage (and even then, it is linked to and only notable because of the parent org). aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

MediaTransparency

MediaTransparency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks the WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:NORG. Longhornsg (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Organizations, Politics, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Sparebanken Norge

Sparebanken Norge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On WP:BEFORE, could not find any WP:N or WP:SIRS. 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 01:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Norway. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. The real question here is whether we still need standalone articles for Sparebanken Vest and Sparebanken Sør, the two banks that merged to form Sparebanken Norge. The two banks merged, and one article is tagged as unreferenced and the other one has sources that probably aren't sufficient to establish notability. Some options to consider might include:

• Draftify Sparebanken Norge
• Merge and redirect Sparebanken Vest and Sparebanken Sør to Sparebanken Norge, making sure that references are added to Sparebanken Norge
• Delete all three because WP:NCORP is not met. Yet.

Cielquiparle (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

The other thing to note is that many reliable-looking sources covering the banking and insurance industries in Norway appear to be paywalled. There probably is more significant coverage in reliable sources but these are difficult to access without a subscription. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:HEY. Significant coverage about Sparebanken Norge about its ongoing restructuring measures since the merger, including relocation of staff (covered in this article in NRK) and its "transformation programme" (covered in this article in E24 (Norwegian online newspaper)). There is also this paywalled article in FinansWatch about many employees who accepted severance packages as of December 2025. As for the other articles, probably merge and redirect Sparebanken Vest into Sparebanken Norge, and blank and redirect Sparebanken Sør into Sparebanken Norge since it is essentially unreferenced (even their official URL now simply redirects to a bank account login). Cielquiparle (talk) 08:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:NCORP. There is now a large amount of significant coverage referenced in the article. There is lots more out there, a lot of which is paywalled. Arsenikk (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Hypothetical star

Hypothetical star (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Exotic star because there are zero reliable sources for "Hypothetical star" cited or on Google Scholar. Exotic star is marginal to be sure, but at most one of these is needed. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:15, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comment I think it'd make more sense the other way around - from Exotic star to Hypothetical star. Merging to Exotic star would not work in my opinion because Exotic star is only for stars made of exotic matter, and many of the hypothetical stars are made up of normal matter (ex blue dwarf, which is a hypothesized later stage of a red dwarf, and population III star, made of hydrogen and helium with very little metal) - therefore, it would become confusing to the reader. Jishara (talk) 03:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, can you provide sources that define "hypothetical star"? I have not found one. Blue dwarf may be a hypothetical class of stars, but that does not make it a "hypothetical star". As far as I can tell, "hypothetical star" is a category created on Wikipedia, not a verifiable type of star. (It turns out that this is also true for "Exotic star", see Talk:Exotic star#Not the Common name). Johnjbarton (talk) 04:15, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

He means Blue dwarf (red-dwarf stage) Abdullah1099 (talk) 07:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. From what I can see an Exotic star is a subclass of this page. I don't think a merge in either direction is good, but the entries in Exotic star should be added here (if they are not already in). For context, checking the first 3 entries -- Blitzar, Blue dwarf and Black dwarf -- they all use the word "hypothetical". I also find plenty of entries in a Google search, some of which should probably be added to the lead. The only thing that I would be OK with is changing the name to "List of hypothetical stars", with the current name a redirect.Ldm1954 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Sargon the Sorcerer

Sargon the Sorcerer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of DC Comics characters: S because no version of the character could pass WP:GNG as far as I'm aware of. Like many pages, it is just a list of plot summaries and nothing establishes notability. CosmicMordecai (talk) 01:11, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

EDIT: I made spelling mistake and made a edit to fix that mistake only.

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related AfD discussions. CosmicMordecai (talk) 01:11, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Washington Road (Georgia)

Washington Road (Georgia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a disputed PROD. The temporary account that removed the PROD notice has not addressed the core concern that this article fails to meet WP:GNG. (The TA added a handful of external links, several of which were not specific to this road.) A search for sources to meet GNG has not borne fruit, leaving deletion as the option unless someone else can locate here-to-fore unknown sources that meet the standard. Imzadi 1979 → 01:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Georgia (U.S. state). Imzadi 1979 → 01:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Draftify as per above discussion. The Google map references gotta go. Bearian (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Does this meet the standards? https://www.augustachronicle.com/story/news/2017/04/05/way-we-were-washington-road/14264470007/ NEWS

Way We Were: Washington Road

Bill Kirbybkirby@augustachronicle.com

April 5, 2017, 6:59 p.m. ET

Vanguard10 (talk) 01:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Hubstaff

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Hubstaff
• Articles for deletion/Hubstaff (2nd nomination)

Hubstaff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this here for discussion rather than unilaterally re-draftifying since the AfD was sparsely attended and nom was subsequently blocked. That said, this has many WP:AISIGNS and not enough sourcing to meet N:CORP. If it does close as draftify, suggest move protection to enforce AfC. Star Mississippi 00:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Software, and Indiana. Star Mississippi 00:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:04, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Ramadan Zaskoci

Ramadan Zaskoci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V and WP:NPOV. The article relies on a YouTube video and local news portals for historical claims. This is page copied from the Albanian Wikipedia via an LLM-generated translation, and uses a promotional and highly biased tone that reads like a story, not an encyclopedic article. FranéRogoz (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Albania, and Kosovo. FranéRogoz (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:Deletion is not cleanup - the article is of a subject that the number of hits in google scholar would seem to show meets notability. Also, WP:LLMTRANSLATE is permitted if it's been reviewed by a person with skill in both languages. Jishara (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep Secondary sources currently cited in the article prove Zaskoci's notability under WP:GNG. His involvement in the region & Battle of Lume & League of Prizren among many others is cross verified by authoritative academic sources, like the Academy of Sciences Institute of History volume Konferenca kombëtare e studimeve për lidhjen shqiptare të prizrenit 1878–1881 (1979, pg 75, 78) and Me pushkë dhe penë për liri e pavarësi (1978, pg 283, 290). Also his long term revolutionary leadership & status are documented in Latifi, 2025, pg 232. As of WP:Deletion is not cleanup any bad layout doesnt mean we are supposed to delete it, personally, we should just refine it WP:PRESERVE. Magapetro (talk) 02:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

If you actually had these academic sources, why didn't you include them in the article in the first place? Instead, you simply copy-pasted the Albanian Wikipedia page, obviously using an LLM to translate it, while keeping completely unreliable, non-academic sources like a YouTube video and local web portals as the only references for this person. I nominated this article for deletion for very good reasons. Simply being mentioned in a few historical books or papers about regional battles does not automatically justify a standalone biographical article. Unless those academic sources provide significant, in-depth coverage of his actual biography rather than just passing mentions, this heavily promotional, non-neutral, AI generated text fails basic encyclopedia standards. FranéRogoz (talk) 03:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)