Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

9 August 2026

To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.

Guide to deletion

Six (EP)

Six (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM. Many of the sources cited in the article either do not provide major coverage of Six, or are primary sources, or are sources that can be considered generally unreliable. I have done a search on Google Books, Google News, and a general Google search, but found no significant coverage of the EP. Google News returned three results: two Fader articles that mention Bunii but not the EP, and an antiMusic tour announcement, written by Warner Records, Bunii's record label, that only briefly lists SIX among his past projects. I have found no independent reviews, interviews, or features covering the subject. eve the eternal (hi) 20:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Gabriel Shaoolian

Gabriel Shaoolian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not seem to meet WP:NBASIC - most of the cited sources have only trivial coverage or are not independent. Article was created in 2013 and deleted via PROD in 2025, then recreated as a draft, and the editor who accepted the AfC in May 2025 was blocked as a sockpuppet of a person with a pattern of likely UPE. There have been no substantive contributions to the article since acceptance (other than me cutting some poorly sourced material), and I found it by looking at orphaned articles. I did basic searches of Google News, Google Books, and Google Scholar, and did not find substantial additional secondary coverage. Dreamyshade (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related AfD discussions. Dreamyshade (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Oakdale Avenue District

Oakdale Avenue District (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Chicago because my BEFORE does not show notability, with mixed results between Chicago and Toledo even. It may, however, be of use in the broader Chicago article. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, United States of America, and Illinois. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Strong support per nom. Loc863 (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

2026 YouTube FIFA Creator Cup

2026 YouTube FIFA Creator Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging because, only WP:ROUTINE coverage, no WP:SIGCOV on independent reliable sources, fails WP:GNG for a dedicated article. Vestrian24Bio 16:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sports, and Football. Vestrian24Bio 16:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Selectively merge. This could be a sentence or two on 2026 FIFA World Cup or the pages for IShowSpeed and Celine Dept. RS do not support standlone notability. Longhornsg (talk) 03:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Does not even merit merging. GiantSnowman 18:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete – Fails WP:GNG and is completely irrelevant to the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Publicwalrus (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 23:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge Page fails [[WP:GNG}} for a standalone article and would be best merged into 2026 FIFA World Cup. Staticspector (talk) 21:33, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Will we merge or will we delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Not worth merging and no lasting interest or relevance. Geschichte (talk) 20:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Harry Langley

Harry Langley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find virtually nothing on this person beyond a passing mention in the history of a park administrative building that "Harry Langley of the NPS Landscape Division designed and supervised the landscaping around the wall and residence soon thereafter." It appears that the places with which he is associated which are NRHP-listed hold this status because of their natural beauty, not the architectural additions to these locations, so the subject is basically a journeyman landscaper/architect building relatively minor structures for the National Park Service in locations that happen to be historic places. BD2412 T 16:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. BD2412 T 16:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• delete there isn't much to be found in Gbooks, or Gsearch. Refs now in the article are from his employer or related websites, so would be Primary. I don't see enough to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

The Enthusiasts

The Enthusiasts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe that this article is a hoax. For a band supposedly so influential, I was not able to find anything resembling a reliable source. I also couldn't find them listed in any of the major music databases, such as MusicBrains or Discogs. The only thing I could find about this supposed band outside of Wikipedia mirrors is a Facebook discussion alleging it to be hoax.1

Even if this band turns out to be real, it's definitely not notable. GranCavallo (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Canada. GranCavallo (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - This article has been sitting here since 2010 and may qualify for one of the all-time oldest at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Well, better late than never. I also can find no evidence that this band really existed. None of their album titles are coming up in searches, and even if they're from 55 years ago they would at least appear in retail sites for old vinyl collectors and such. The band and their albums are not present at Discogs.com, which I know is not a fully reliable site but it is well-known for its geek-worthy lists of every record that ever existed. None of the supposed members or anyone else named is coming up in searches as associated with a band called The Enthusiasts. I did find that there is a real Dr. Adeen Khokhar, but he is an American podiatrist and not a Canadian garage rock producer. Well done, pranksters! ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced, so that's no help. Plenty of others using this name; a garage band from NY , a substack and others... Delete as a likely hoax and lack of sourcing, not showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Was also created by a red-linked username in 2010 that never bothered to create a profile here, another sure sign of a hoax. Oaktree b (talk) 16:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Jabal Shada

Battle of Jabal Shada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There is no WP:SIGCOV in the academic sources, and I searched the Authors of the cited sources and found that none of them have an education in academic History. Searching "Battle of Jabal Shada" gives no results relating to this war and instead gives results relating to spillovers of the current civil war in Yemen or the "Jabal Shada Natural Reserve" in Saudi. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 14:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Idrisid–Mutawakillite war and merge anything suitable (although it seems like there's nothing). Scarce coverage in Arabic indicates there can be nothing found in other languages. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• @HerrHeulsuse: I've already pointed out in Talk:Idrisid–Mutawakillite war#Recent additions and in my edit summaries in that article that the authors of the sources cited are self-proclaimed "historians" with 0 academic background. Why should we preserve content that isn't even supported by WP:RS 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

2007 Southern Manitoba tornado outbreak

2007 Southern Manitoba tornado outbreak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2007 Elie tornado did a good job of describing the whole event prior to this article being created; this one is essentially just a reprint of that article and really isn't needed. ChessEric 14:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Social science and Canada. ChessEric 14:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

AquaMouse

AquaMouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Disney Wish because there isn't nearly enough out there for this to warrant a standalone article, and it's a poor candidate for merging. It's questionable if this meets notability standards, as there does exist independent coverage of it, but of limited depth, and it is inherently linked to the notability of the whole cruise ships. Even if was notable, I don't see why information about AquaMouse wouldn't be best covered at the articles about the ships it is installed on. The choice to propose redirecting over merging is due to the cruise ship articles already covering AquaMouse, and the paragraphs of additional detail in the AquaMouse article have promotional concerns and would also be WP:UNDUE if included as-is in the cruise ship articles. It seems like a whole lot of effort for next to no return. Choosing Disney Wish as the redirect target as it's the lead vessel of the class of ships the AquaMouse is installed on. The AquaDuck redirect should be pointed to Disney Dream instead. –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 12:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Disney and Travel and tourism. –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 12:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Arnel David

Arnel David (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Performing the second AfD step on behalf of a temporary account as requested at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion § Proposed deletion Arnel David. I have no opinion on the actual proposal and won't watch this discussion.

Justification is lack of notability and self-publishing of the article. Article is about an army colonel of no particular notability, with biographical information either without references or based on self-generated references (for example biographical box on self-authored army article). The press source quoted is actually the local base and internal-comms bulletins and therefore does not represent the significant press coverage required for notability. Also looks to be nearly entirely self authored and self-maintained as User:Army Strategist’s contributions are primarily to this article, a book he co-edited as part of his role in the US Army and a single other US army officer. As noted in Talk:Arnel David the whole article seems to be intended as a personal CV. ~2026-43660-38 (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

FaviFake (talk) 13:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete. This seems to be a case of self promotion, and the same goes for the articles for Matthew J. Van Wagenen and Military Strategy in the 21st Century, no notability at all and most of the edits made by just one person. HallyTall (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Video games, Military, Artificial intelligence, Philippines, England, Florida, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Long-range sanction

Long-range sanction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO. It's an interesting phrase, but by itself, it isn't notable as an encyclopedia topic. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related AfD discussions. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 12:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Russia, and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 12:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:NOTPHRASEBOOK. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:35, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Deep strike campaign. With the article's co-title being "long-range strike campaign", I believe this would be a valid redirect with the template R from related word. What do you think @Dennis Brown and Zxcvbnm? Johnson524 14:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  It would need to be merged, not just redirected. I still oppose, however. It's a little-known one-off euphemism and would need much more coverage and popularity to be worth mentioning. It falls under WP:MADEUPONEDAY at the moment. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:52, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  What is there to merge? I'd say nothing worth it that's not already in the target. While I still believe the article shouldn't be kept, I wouldn't say this is little known or recently made up either, with Zelenskyy using the term to describe his strategy throughout the past year of the war in 2025 and 2026: being commented on by media like Reuters and legacy media like The New York Times. Johnson524 02:45, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• I'm not necessarily against (or for) making it a redirect, it does get a lot of passing mentions, but that isn't enough for it to be an article, which would require significant coverage of the term, which is absent and not likely to happen anyway. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Automorphism group of a free group

Automorphism group of a free group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Nielsen transformation because the content of this article essentially duplicates what is stated in that one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related AfD discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. Both the proposed target and Out(Fn) describe special cases of automorphisms of the free group. It makes no sense to have two articles on special cases of the general concept but then redirect the general concept title to one of them. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  Out(Fn) is not really about "special cases", since it talks about the quotient group and not which automorphisms are outer. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:16, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  Its elements are equivalence classes of elements of the full automorphism group. It is misleading to imply that it is unrelated. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  I'm not saying it is unrelated, but it is not a special case. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose The article is in bad shape but it does not make much sense to redirect it to Nielsen transformation, and most of the current content is not in the page about Out(F_n). I added some group-theoretical properties to make it less stubby. jraimbau (talk) 12:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Singlish vocabulary

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Singlish vocabulary
• Articles for deletion/Singlish vocabulary (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Singlish vocabulary (3rd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Singlish vocabulary (4th nomination)

Singlish vocabulary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary: WP:NOTDICT. All information here is duplicated from Singlish. The section of vocabulary in Singlish is not enough to warrant its own article. Most words are unsourced and not interesting enough to warrant more than a dictionary definition and hence an inclusion in Wikipedia.

Unlike previous discussions, with the last one in 2013:

- The Singlish dictionary launched in 2024 exists, making this an unnecessary resource.

- All information here can be merged into Singlish as Singlish grammar has been split out. Deletion of this article is the same as merging it in, as I have found reliable sources and expanded it at Singlish to the best I can. If Singlish gets too long, the candidate of splitting is likelier to be History of Singlish; this section is too short.

- "Fascinatingness" of Singlish discussed in threads such as here are irrelevant to this article; all information about the "fascinatingness" have since been added to Singlish. Hypnoticreflection (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Singapore. Hypnoticreflection (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy
• Articles for deletion/Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy (2nd nomination)

Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only WP:ROUTINE coverage, no WP:SIGCOV on independent reliable sources, fails WP:GNG for an article. Vestrian24Bio 08:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Cricket, and United Arab Emirates. Vestrian24Bio 08:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

It was an ICC sanctioned tournament and deserves to have a presence on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-42100-56 (talk) 20:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

It was an ICC sanctioned professional cricket tournament and hence should be kept for statistics and analytics purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-42100-56 (talk) 20:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:NOTSTATS Vestrian24Bio 02:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete: per WP:GNG and WP:NOTSTATS.

• Fails General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG): Just because something exists or gets a thumbs up from a governing body (like the ICC) doesn't mean it's notable. Subjects need solid coverage real, independent sources that aren't just echoing the same old stuff. Routine match reports, scorecards, schedules, and event announcements? They count as WP:ROUTINE coverage, not enough to meet GNG.
• WP:NOTSTATS & WP:DATABASE: Wikipedia aims to educate, not serve as a database full of sports stats. Just saying it's useful for statistics or analytics won't cut it if there's no independent coverage backing it up.

If there aren't independent sources that go beyond routine to show notability, the article should be deleted. Elison Pokhrel ^TALK 13:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

MaViGun

MaViGun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Citations cover statements by Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy and other YSR Congress Party leaders promoting MaViGun as a political proposal and election issue, the same is mentioned in this article as well. The sources are reliable but according to me they provide little independent, in depth coverage of MaViGun as a standalone subject. Per WP:NOTNEWS, coverage of current political developments does not by itself establish notability. Any verifiable content about the proposal can be covered in Andhra Pradesh capital issue or YSR Congress Party articles. Wikipicked (talk) 07:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Geography, and Andhra Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – I am the article creator. The nomination understates the independent secondary coverage available. MaViGun has received direct and non-trivial coverage over several months from multiple editorially independent outlets. Hindustan Times reports not only party statements but internal party reactions, opposition responses and an independent political analyst's assessment. India Today contains dedicated sections explaining why MaViGun was proposed and analysing the competing MaViGun–Amaravati positions. ThePrint examines the political, governance and investor consequences and includes independent trade-body commentary. The Federal directly compares MaViGun with the Integrated Capital Region and discusses financing, land and political implications. This constitutes more than trivial mention and supports WP:GNG; significant coverage does not require the topic to be the sole subject of every source. WP:NOTNEWS cautions against relying solely on routine announcements, but it does not exclude a topic that has received repeated, contextual and analytical coverage rather than a single burst of reporting. The article should therefore be kept and improved with these sources. If consensus considers a standalone article premature, merging or redirecting it to the Andhra Pradesh capital issue would be preferable to outright deletion. Karthik 5678 (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  The sources still don't demonstrate significant independent coverage per WP:GNG.They report political statements, about their future campaign, and reactions over the proposal, nothing that clears significant coverage on the subject MaViGun.

  And I feel that the sources don't support the level of analytical treatment that you're saying. According to me, much of the coverage appears to come from the ongoing Andhra Pradesh capital debate and Jagan's election messaging. Politicians regularly put forward policy proposals and campaign themes, but that alone does not make each proposal independently notable. What matters here is whether "MaViGun" has received significant independent coverage under WP:GNG. Over merging, redirecting or deleting, consensus will decide that. I'm still towards redirecting or merging as mentioned in my nom. Wikipicked (talk) 11:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for clarifying. I agree that routine reports repeating political announcements would not, by themselves, satisfy WP:GNG. My position rests principally on the depth of the independent treatment in the India Today and The Federal reports, rather than on the total number of reports. India Today devotes separate sections to why MaViGun is being proposed and to the MaViGun–Amaravati debate, discussing its political distinctiveness from the earlier three-capital proposal, the competing development and cost arguments, regional political considerations, and the consequences of repeated capital-policy changes for farmers, investors and administration. The Federal separately compares MaViGun with the government's Integrated Capital Region and discusses financing pressure, contractor confidence, land values and the alleged influence of MaViGun on the government's evolving capital-region framing. These are direct and detailed treatments of the proposal, not merely passing mentions or reproductions of an announcement. Under WP:SIGCOV, coverage need not make MaViGun the exclusive subject of the entire publication. I have therefore incorporated the strongest independent material into the article and continue to believe that the available sourcing supports retention as a standalone article, while recognising that the closer will determine whether Keep or Merge best reflects the evidence. Karthik 5678 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Beri Cinta Waktu (TV series)

Beri Cinta Waktu (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was a draft at Draft:Beri Cinta Waktu, but while that existed this page was created. I've declined the draft since it doesn't meet the notability mark for the topic, and neither does this article since the sources mainly discuss cast changes. HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Television-related AfD discussions. HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Snov.io

Snov.io (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, no independent, in-depth coverage. Lone Wolf ^howl 09:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. Lone Wolf ^howl 09:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of New York-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. There is no notability and fails WP:NCORP. ~2026-41539-18 (talk) 06:20, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Miss Puerto Rico's Outstanding Teen

Miss Puerto Rico's Outstanding Teen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Fails to meet GNG with a single source. Proposed for deletion earlier this year as "Tagged as Unreferenced for 8 years", then de-PRODded with erroneous edit summary "all state level pageants have a page", and then a single citation added, which does not constitute a meaningful improvement vis a vis GNG. My own WP:BEFORE failed to turn up reliable sources. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Beauty pageants and Puerto Rico. Shellwood (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. This does not meet WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Weak Keep I think the idea that all states have a page is relevant. Not so much for the fact that well Puerto Rico should have a page too, but in the spirit of covering the Miss USA Teen competition to the most relevant and clear extent. Deleting this article works against that. However, the editing pattern described above does not help the matter and this should receive additional work. AadamentAardvark (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, no, I'm sure the closer will know that "All examples X of category Y should have a Wikipedia page" is fallacious, everything has to meet the general notability guideline or, more properly, the notability policy. No local discussion trumps Wikipedia policies. Every article is subject to case-by-case scrutiny. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "All X should have an article" is just as weak an argument as "Fails GNG". Source analysis, please.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Methods for calculating capital requirements on securitisation positions under EU banking law

Methods for calculating capital requirements on securitisation positions under EU banking law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Where to begin. The article is clearly AI-generated, for starters, based on the formatting, nonexistent categories (edit: I meant redlinked "see also" entries), malformatted references, pointless tables, and so on. It's also FAR too detailed for a general audience, and provides essentially nothing in the way of context other than linking to the Capital Requirements Regulation (which happens to also make this page redundant). For such a detailed article there are surprisingly few citations, all of which are to primary sources, and none of which are provided with a URL (despite being fairly recent, last 15 years). If I were cynical, I would suggest this is just an AI summary of the technical portions of these primary sources. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Law, and Europe. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• delete very likely AI/LLm created, with little in-line sourcing used. Also very specialized, not suitable for a general wiki audience. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sister Other Paranoia

Sister Other Paranoia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I speedied this as A7, but RainCandy U has requested restoration on the understanding that I would bring it here. It's not even released, I can't see any way in which it meets WP:Notability (video games). Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:25, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Video games, Software, and Japan. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 12:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - While Sister Other Paranoia is currently unreleased, I believe it has received substantial independent coverage that provides a credible basis for notability. The game has been covered by multiple independent publications, including Anime News Network, AUTOMATON WEST, and Game*Spark. This coverage includes its announcement, development, gameplay, an interview with writer and director nyalra, and its first-day Steam wishlist milestone. The article's references document this coverage. I understand that the game being unreleased may make its notability more difficult to establish, but I believe the existing independent coverage should be considered rather than treating its unreleased status alone as determinative. RainCandy U (talk) 12:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom fails WP:Notability (video games) and is WP:TOOSOON, promotional and interviews and annoucements are not reliable, independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 12:44, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Serenity Forge#Games, where it is already included in the list of games. I agree that the current available sources, both in the article and found upon searches, just fall into the category of run of the mill announcements and the like, and it is too soon to see if it will receive more in-depth coverage upon release. But, a valid redirect target exists to use as an WP:ATD, and if it does end up getting significant coverage after release, it can then be easily restored as an article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Nohai

Nohai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anywhere where Nogai Khan is spelled Nohai (and if it does mean "dog" in Mongolian, why would anybody be named that?), while the second entry in this alleged dab page is a partial match that isn't mentioned in the linked article. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, Disambiguations, Mongolia, and Central Asia. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 12:27, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Captain Aníbal Arab Airport

Captain Aníbal Arab Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable airfield stub. Article fails WP:GNG - only sources are primary. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Bolivia. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Smederevo Airfield

Smederevo Airfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been unsourced since 2024, with no sign of anyone actually adding sources. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Serbia. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Smara Airport

Smara Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable airfield stub. Article fails WP:GNG - only sources are SYNTH or primary. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Morocco. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sunshine Holiday Hotel

Sunshine Holiday Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hoax, likely original research, no source to prove it exists, the only source in the article is a passage introducing the pathway of a hiking route that didn't even mention the building. Also sounds unreasonable to call an abandoned house a 'hotel'. Chinese Wikipedia has just deleted this article. Aqurs1 (talk) 11:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Travel and tourism, and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. I can’t find any reliable sources about this to justify notability and having an article. Aude (talk) 13:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Madhav Prasad Devkota

Madhav Prasad Devkota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not an article! The fact that someone is born in Nepal does not make him notable for an article. The references are all invalid or dead. Rofraja (talk) 09:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Nepal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:07, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Mustafa Akoush

Mustafa Akoush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is an appointed member of a transitional assembly. The article fails WP:GNG as it lacks significant, independent secondary source coverage focusing on the individual. Sakiv (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Politics, and Syria. Sakiv (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Mochiak & AhWoo

Mochiak & AhWoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously nominated for speedy deletion via WP:A7 and WP:A1 but declined each time, which would make it inappropriate for me to tag for speedy deletion a third time.

That said, there is not even an assertion of notability for this brand. The single independent source provided thus far falls way short of WP:CORPDEPTH requirements. There are other hits online but the coverage is similarly thin. For example, Channel News Asia says that the business is run by someone called Charmaine Teo who runs the brand at night while working full-time in beauty marketing in an unrelated job throughout the day. That isn't really significant coverage of the brand, though. The Smart Local briefly mentions an EZ-Link charm design but does not describe the brand in any detail at all. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing here to indicate significance let alone corporate notability. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

R. D. Raja

R. D. Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to , the sources are not independent of the subject or are passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Redirect to Remo, his most significant work. DareshMohan (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment, no opinion on notability, but I oppose a redirect, as I see no evidence Remo is the film he is mostly associated to, and those looking for this person would be better served by the search results page, listing all his credits and not just one. --Cavarrone 18:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Yola Airport

Yola Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of airports in Nigeria - article fails WP:GNG - the only sources are primary sources, which verify existence and statistics, but don’t establish notability. There are vast swathes of unsourced content. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 06:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Oppose this is a puzzling nom, article is about an international airport with a half-dozen passenger routes. Doesn't appear to fail GNG as nom claims. Electricmemory (talk) In solidarity 09:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

There is not a single secondary source, so by definition it fails GNG Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Bitfrost

Bitfrost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks sufficient independent, reliable secondary sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Much of the article relies on primary technical specifications from the project itself. In addition, it describes a security model that while interesting is relatively generic, and not notable by itself either. -- Arcade Wise (they/them) (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Software-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to OLPC XO, basically entirely dependent on that and not separately notable. The most interesting bit of the text is the note on its etymology to Bifröst, but while it's attributed to "the specification" (so could presumably be cited) it remains uncited after 19 years. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Saint George Tower, Hilandar

Saint George Tower, Hilandar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging this article with Albanian Tower, as they seem to be duplicates, if not POV forks. As far as I can see, they are both about the structure in Hilandar Monastery on Mount Athos in Greece, although Albanian Tower's coordinates are incorrect. I have no opinion on which should remain - I picked this one to start the AfD on since it was created a day after Albanian Tower.

Also pinging User:Palatinosunriser, User:Cplakidas, User:Arberian2444, User:Hilandarion, and User:7&6=thirteen since they are the major contributors to these two articles. Iiii I I I (talk) 06:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, History, Religion, Christianity, Greece, and Serbia. Iiii I I I (talk) 06:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Totally oppose, it's not the same monastery, per kasta.eu Saint George Tower, Hilandar is one monastery while the "Albanian" Tower is another --Palatinosunriser (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  I see, my mistake. Is there a reason Albanian Tower says "also known as ... Saint George Tower"? Are there two places named Saint George Tower at Hilandar Monastery? Iiii I I I (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  I checked the article and I see edit warring and removal of sourced content. My conclusion is "Albanian Tower" is an incorrect, fabricated name coined by Albanian nationalists. The towers at Hilandar do not bear ethnic or nation names. The names are about saints or people (George, Sava, Milutin). In reality, this structure is not a tower but a pillar (pirg in Serbian). It is a fact that a person of Albanian origin, John Kastrioti, donated it in 15th century to the Serbian Orthodox monastery. The correct name for this structure is the Saint George Pillar; however, to avoid ambiguity, I recommend renaming Albanian Tower to John's Saint George Pillar. See ref

  • Androudis, Pascal (2000-01-01). "Ερειπωμένος βυζαντινός πύργος στο Άγιον Όρος - Ruined Byzantine tower on Mount Athos". Μακεδονικά (in Greek). 32: 355–363. doi:10.12681/makedonika.176. ISSN 2241-2018.
  • Androudis, Pascal (2010). "Three early shallow-butressed towers of the monastery of Chilandar, on Mount Athos" (PDF). p. 247.
  • Androudis, Pascal (2002). "Ιστορικές και αρχαιολογικές μαρτυρίες για τον «Πύργο του Αλβανού» της Μονής Χελανδαρίου στο Άγιον Όρος - Historical and archaeological evidence for the "Albanian Tower" of the Chelandari Monastery on Mount Athos". Byzantiaka. 22 (1): 217–246.

  Palatinosunriser (talk) 06:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Avoid ambiguities - Rename Albanian Tower to John's Saint George Pillar : Per sources the most reasonable option to avoid ambiguities--Palatinosunriser (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Meath

Coat of arms of Meath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to County Meath because the article has existed since 2007, and could easily be a section titled "symbols" or something. No need for full article currently (maybe a list of coat of arms of irish counties could be made! I'd be willing to help, but dunno if thats too relevant) Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment. While I'm inclined to support a merge/redirect somewhere (as the text is relatively short, has been for a long time, and could likely be covered with improved context in the article on the place the arms represent), I'm not sure the proposed target is ideal. Can the nom elaborate more on the proposed target? What would a "symbols" section in the County Meath article look like? And, perhaps, would Kingdom of Meath not be a better place for such a section (and redirect target)? I say this for several reasons. Not least that the coat of arms given in the infobox for County Meath is the arms of the county council, which is different to the historic arms (and trying to cover both in the article on the modern county could be confusing/complicating)?... Guliolopez (talk) 23:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  A symbols section on that article would include details on the county council's arms and the historic arms (and the county colours if theres enough that could be written about them from reliable sources). To get an example; Roxburghshire has a Coat of Arms section, which I imagine this would look similar to

  I do think that merging to kingdom of meath is also a good idea. Maybe both could be done? Dont see any harm in merging to both Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi. While we could perhaps briefly discuss the arms in a "symbols" section of both County Meath and Kingdom of Meath, the redirect (resulting from a merge/redirect) can only be to one title. Personally, as above, I think Kingdom of Meath is a more appropriate target. And, as it stands, don't support a merge/redirect to County Meath. But would support a merge/redirect to Kingdom of Meath. (For the simple reason that the subject arms are not (or are no longer) the arms of County Meath. But are the historical arms of the Kingdom of Meath.) Guliolopez (talk) 12:51, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  I think that we could merge to both and have the redirect go to kingdom of meath, as that is the origin of them Froglord (Finnfrog99) (talk) 12:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi. While a "merge to both" is not a good idea, I would support merging the bulk of the content to a section of Kingdom of Meath and making Coat of arms of Meath a redirect to that section. The County Meath article could contain a small amount of relevant text, in summary style, with a link to the main article/target/section. Guliolopez (talk) 17:24, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merge to County Meath, mostly for the reasons laid out by Guliolopez but also because I see no great need for any merge. The article is not too short to be useful (compare Emblems of the Kalmar Union, Coat of arms of Congress Poland etc.). It does the job. Meanwhile, a lot of the (admittedly interesting) info in the current page would be a little extraneous in Kingdom of Meath and County Meath. References in both Kingdom of Meath and probably County Meath as in Guliolopez's latest comment would be helpful. That said, if other heraldry etc. relating to the Kingdom of Meath are found I would support renaming to accommodate them. Taghdtaighde (talk) 23:40, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep/Oppose Merging: As I see it this article does its job well enough and would, as said above, feel out of place elsewhere. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:31, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Sanskar Bharti

Sanskar Bharti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this for delete as there aren't available online English references to the history and origin of Sanskar Bharti besides the primary source (the organization's website) to prove it. This entity seems to be an office or administrative arm of a political party in India called RSS. I'd have considered merge if there were available secondary articles. ABehjat (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Organizations, Politics, and India. ABehjat (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Delete because of no significant secondary coverage. Entychologist (talk) 21:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: for clarity, English Wikipedia sources are not required to be in English, they are simply preferred when available. That of course can be a moot point if there is no SIGCOV in any language. (No opinion on that front.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - my searches on Google News and Books found dozens of potential sources, in English. Some are self-published, some are passing mentions, and others are clearly not independent of the cultural organization or its political affiliation; but there are a few that constitute significant coverage, and I added two such sources. Bearian (talk) 03:49, 30 July 2026 (UTC) P.S. Obviously, this is not an endorsement of the subject or of RSS; it's just a fact of notability. Nobody claims that Fox News is not notable, because it's basically the media wing of a major political party. Bearian (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Velalar Vidyalayaa Senior Higher Secondary School

Velalar Vidyalayaa Senior Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Thindal, Erode, where it's listed, as an ATD-R. Just another ROTM institute. Additional searches yielded nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:37, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Kenmore Air Flight 140

Kenmore Air Flight 140 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:RUNOFTHEMILL crash with no fatalities. Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. Frank_{(has DemoCracy DeprivaTion)} 13:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, Transportation, and Washington. Frank_{(has DemoCracy DeprivaTion)} 13:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - per nomination. --ZimZalaBim^talk 13:37, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: SIGCOV for this does exist. Such as this one from The Seattle Times which goes into quite substantial detail on the people involved. ROTM is an essay, and is not a valid PAG rationale for deletion. 11WB 💬 14:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: - News sources are still covering this subject. I agree with 11WB. FiReItUpBr0 (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC) — FiReItUpBr0 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

All 11 in board were injured and 1 was in critical condition. Just because no one dies, it doesn’t mean it is a runonthemill incident. ::FiReItUpBr0* FiReItUpBr0 (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Weak keep provided that the article can be expanded and the SIGCOV can be properly demonstrated. If it cannot be expanded much further beyond its current state then I would suggest merging with Kenmore Air. However I do not consider an aircraft crashing and being completely destroyed by fire to be 'run of the mill'. Cubnorth (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep or merge. Borderline case, since this is a (hopefully) non-fatal accident involving a small plane, but larger than general aviation. Even if the criteria for a separate article are not met, coverage in the Kenmore Air article is warranted. Sjakkalle (Check!) 20:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC

Note it is mentioned at Kenmore_Air#Incidents_and_accidents. --ZimZalaBim^talk 20:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to Kenmore Air#Incidents and accidents as an ATD. This is WP:TOOSOON, it only happened recently and there's not enough widespread coverage to determine if it will meet WP:NEVENT criteria. Redirecting will retain the page history for future update in the unlikely chance this receives enough sustained coverage to meet the mark. nf utvol (talk) 21:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. The article meets several criteria. Most importantly, it meets WP:N having news coverage, even in a few foreign countries. It definitely has reliable sources. It even meets WP:Planecrash. The plane was engulfed in a big fire according to news photos. There's not too much left to savage and rebuild. All of the passengers were injured, some needing to be transferred to another hospital. There is a NTSB investigation according to reliable sources. The flight was a scheduled flight. Deaths are not required for a WP article as evidenced by Air France Flight 358 and US Airways Flight 1549. Neither is there a requirement for the flight to be of a huge airline, like United or Qantas, or that the aircraft be jet powered, as in Regional Airlines Flight 9288. In this Kenmore Air crash, 100% of the people in the aircraft were injured, including some in critical condition, broken bones, etc. It is the 2nd worse crash in the airline's 80 year history. Kenmore Air is a very old airline, older than Southwest Airlines, Swiss International, SAS Scandinavian Airlines. Vanguard10 (talk) 22:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

keep. Too recent to an deletion discussion, the accident happened 8 days ago. It hasn't even 10 days yet. ~2026-42678-97 (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC) — 2026-42678-97 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

CNN reports the plane was consumed, just look at this photo. []

All of that might be true, but I don't see how that satisfies WP:NEVENT. Need lasting coverage/significance. Not just that it was in the news cycle the days it happened. (And the NTSB automatically investigates such incidents). --ZimZalaBim^talk 22:48, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

It meets WP:EVENT and WP:N. If the criteria is "need lasting coverage/significance" and you apply that criteria in a draconian fashion, then most of Wikpedia should be deleted. How much coverage do you have of the Eastern Air Lines Flight 66 today? None. Yet that crash is still in the minds of many. I just thought to myself, "what was a crash in the 1970's in the New York or general East Coast that I remember" and EA flight 66 immediately came to mind though not the exact flight number. Vanguard10 (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

I encourse you to re-read WP:NEVENT and the description of the general inclusion criteria. --ZimZalaBim^talk 22:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

I'll echo this back and advise you to read WP:EVENTCRIT#2. An incident that only happened weeks ago is obviously not going to have lasting coverage, as not enough time has passed. 11WB 💬 23:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

ZimZalaBim, did you know that your cited WP:NEVENT has a bold section heading of "Don't rush to delete articles"! As far as WP:NEVENT, this article likely meets criteria 1 and 2 and 3 for inclusion. #1. It will likely have historical significance as the 2nd worse plane crash that 80 year old Kenmore Air has ever had. #2, it has coverage over diverse sources, including CNN and at least 2 foreign sources. #3, it has lesser coverage, too. Vanguard10 (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Again, the coverage is WP:ROUTINE (don't be wowed by CNN picking up a local news storty that has good video clips for TV). And your claim "It will likely have historical significance as the 2nd worse plane crash" is both WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:OR (their airline had two incidients with fatalities; why is this worse than one of those?) --ZimZalaBim^talk 12:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Not sure how OR is relevant as this is all based on legitimate reporting. EVENTCRIT#2 covers this incident. Reports such as the one I linked in my !vote go beyond standard routine coverage. Whether this ends up as the "second worst crash" is not relevant. AfD cares about notability, which this incident is (as is also evident by the fact consensus is swinging towards keeping the article at this time). 11WB 💬 12:35, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

OR is relevant because Vanguard10 repeatedly has argued notability comes, in part, due to this supposedly being the "2nd worse plane crash" which is an arbitrary opinion of theirs. --ZimZalaBim^talk 14:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

OR applies to content actually present in an article. If that opinion were added in, it would be OR, yes. Outside of that it's simply an opinion being expressed. 11WB 💬 14:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

See, that's why we need this article!!! Ha ha ha! I didn't know about the crash where the sole occupant was killed. By having this article, we now can compare. This crash had the highest casualties of any Kenmore Air crash but no deaths. In some ways, it's the worst Kenmore Air crash. In some ways, it's the 3rd worse. Vanguard10 (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vanguard10, I've twice responded to you now on my talk page. Please keep AfD discussion here, rather than there now. Thanks. 11WB 💬 06:33, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vanguard10 On the other hand, it also has a bold Don't rush to create articles. I think this is where a redirect would be helpful...it's unclear as to whether or not this will meet NEVENT in the future (I think it's unlikely we'll see much beyond the initial news cycle, save for maybe a regurgitation of the NTSB report when that's published). If it does end up getting wider coverage, then the history is still there and it can quickly be updated and restored. nf utvol (talk) 07:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: the only reason it got nominated is because the crash had no fatalities (WP:RUNOFTHEMILL indicator is also the no-fatality evidence).Ohok12 (talk) 16:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  Also, coverage sill there. I found too many articles that got nominated because of being a no-fatality crash. Ohok12 (talk) 16:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: This is a notable crash and crashes like this don’t happen every day. This was not a general aviation incident, this was a passenger seaplane incident. PENNAVGEEKJ1718 (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Weak keep for now per WP:TSTD: it's too early to determine whether this will have WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE beyond the initial news cycle, or WP:LASTING effects and, while most of the existing sources are clearly just routine reporting, there are signs that this accident might attract some WP:INDEPTH reports (I can't tell whether the Seattle Times piece linked above would count, as it is behind a paywall). Rosbif73 (talk) 06:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry about that @Rosbif. Here is an archived version for you. 11WB 💬 11:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for the archive link. That looks to me like routine reporting: recounting what happened, not analysing it; i.e. WP:PRIMARYNEWS not WP:SIGCOV or WP:INDEPTH. This doesn't make my 'weak keep' any stronger; if this is the best we've got, I could easily get behind a redirect to Kenmore Air#Incidents and accidents as an ATD while we wait to see if any true in-depth coverage emerges. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  That's a fair position to take. I believe that article is substantial enough to meet the threshold of SIGCOV, as it's at least better than the usual few paragraphs we get in routine incidents. As you know, I've nominated many new aviation articles that pop-up. Usually they are lacking the required coverage. This one is a bit stronger I think. 11WB 💬 13:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tending keep but the arguments seem backwards. Surely the lasting coverage comes first?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment Already advocated for a redirect above, but would like to point out that there does not appear to have been any significant coverage of this event since the initial media flurry. This lends further weight to the argument that it does not meet the WP:NEVENT lasting coverage requirement. nf utvol (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Vadiraj ( actor)

Vadiraj ( actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are not in-depth, only passing mention, fails NACTOR. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Record of decision

Record of decision (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying because of the very bare-bones content. Frankly, I don't believe the page in its current form is good enough for mainspace. It definitely needs at least some more work and content done before that. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Politics, and United States of America. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:48, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:DRAFTNO, I do not think we should draftify this since the article has been in existence since 2009. I think the article could be expanded a bit and add citations. Aude (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Ravi Varma (Kakinada actor)

Ravi Varma (Kakinada actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Provided sources are the reviews of films, no in-depth references about him, fails WP:GNG. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, India, and Andhra Pradesh. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Article was created by the subject, a G11 was rejected as the article was not promotional, and they were subsequently blocked for sockpuppetry, but looking over that I think they were operating in good faith and just woefully unaware of Wikipedia policies. (To be frank, I don't exactly think that was the greatest block.) The article has been subsequently completely rewritten by non-COI editors. The nominator cited WP:NACTOR a few AfDs above this one, and while I'm not all that familiar with how it is usually handled, this actor seems to have starred in multiple notable films (Aaruguru Pativratalu, Buchinaidu Kandriga (film), Prathyardhi), and so I'd say weak keep. 1brianm7 (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Brahm Bhardwaj

Brahm Bhardwaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are from blog website, no evidence of notability, fails NACTOR. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 04:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Underwater Nightmare

Underwater Nightmare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any evidence of this EP meeting WP:NALBUM. JTtheOG (talk) 03:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America. JTtheOG (talk) 03:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I'd also go Delete. No references, longstanding issue. Haz215 (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Kanniyakumari District Railway

Kanniyakumari District Railway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Thiruvananthapuram–Nagercoil–Kanyakumari line because this appears to be a duplicate article with a slightly different name and format. I don't know which name is best, but this article has been an orphan for a long time. Dreamyshade (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. Dreamyshade (talk) 03:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:DUP. Did you nominate it instead of merging it just because you weren't sure abut the title? FaviFake (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

  Yeah, not sure about the right name, and wondering if there’s something subtle I’m missing that would make an ordinary merge not suitable, since I’m not familiar with the region. Dreamyshade (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Pendulum Drift

Pendulum Drift (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable film and self-promotion by them. None of the cited sources meet WP:SIGCOV. There are no film reviews by critics. Fails WP:NFILM. BookishReader (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:02, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

• Keep. The claim that there are no valid sources or that it fails WP:NFILM is factually incorrect. The feature film passes WP:NFILM and WP:GNG based on extensive international award recognition, technical press, and documented festival exhibition:

1. Major International Accolades: Winner of over 14 international film festival awards across Europe (including Best Feature Film, Best Director, Best Sound, and Best Score across festival competitions in Portugal, Greece, Norway, and Italy, such as the Samhain Baucogna International Film Festival and Future of Film Awards).
2. Industry Technical & Score Coverage: Featured in specialized industry media (Sound on Sound) for its technical soundtrack, sound design, and indie production architecture.
3. Festival Curation & Program Slots: Documented in official festival catalogs and theatrical programs internationally, including reviews and curatorial selections by international programmers.

The film has demonstrated clear, verifiable international distribution and critical recognition across the global festival circuit. Kcoripop (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

The verifiable claim in that block of LLM text is Samhain Bacogna. This group has a monthly award, which this film won in June (as Best Feature Film). While the annual awards are attributed to an (unnamed) panel of expert judges, the monthly are not. I am not convinced that this is a notable award, as it is pay-to-enter, given monthly (so there are around 100 winners/year across the various categories), and the basis for judging is not clear.

The other "over 14" need some evidence, please.

The Sound on Sound link given above goes to the landing page. Please link to the actual article.

Appearance in festival catalogs and programs is not useful for notability. If there are substantive independent reviews (not just capsule plot summaries in programs) please link to some.

I am not collapsing the LLM text because I wanted to talk about the sources, but please do not use LLMs to communicate here or your contributions are likely to be collapsed and disregarded. M kuhner (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Point taken on the festival distinctions. To keep the focus strictly on reliable secondary coverage per WP:NFILM:

1. Sound on Sound Feature: The technical score and sound design architecture article is available here: https://www.soundonsound.com/sound-advice/20-ways-create-cash-your-audio-gear-skills 2. Broad-sheet & Retrospective Press: The film's cultural context and directorial background are featured in broadsheet coverage such as The Express Tribune (https://tribune.com.pk/story/2591579/kites-in-the-sky-stories-on-screen-basant-in-punjabi-cinema-and-music) alongside contemporary print reviews in Scottish press (Perthshire Advertiser, Rough Cuts).

I will leave the smaller festival lists aside (although I have researched Samhainbaucogna and it seems to be a well-respected run festival with academics and critics alike), and keep the discussion centered on these secondary media sources. Kcoripop (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

The Sound on Sound source does not mention the words "Pendulum" or "Drift". It has a two sentence passing mention of Afzal and Bo Kata which would not be enough to constitute SIGCOV for either of them, but no coverage of Pendulum Drift at all. It is also not a "technical score and sound design architecture" article; it's "20 Ways To Create Cash From Your Audio Gear and Skills."

The Express Tribune source does not mention the words "Pendulum" or "Drift" either, though it actually is SIGCOV for Bo Kata.

I think you have confused different cases at AfD. This thread is only for comments on the notability of Pendulum Drift. Please post sources for the other articles only on those articles' threads. M kuhner (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Acknowledged regarding the source separation across the deletion discussions. Given that the secondary press coverage for Pendulum Drift is primarily rooted in its international festival circuit run rather than separate broadsheet reviews, I will leave it to the online community and reviewing administrator(s) to evaluate under WP:NFILM, or consider a redirect/merge to the primary biographical article if deemed appropriate. Kcoripop (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Do you reply with LLM? Geschichte (talk) 17:13, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete the sources in the article are not independent, non-trivial coverage... many do not mention the movie, or amount to a credit for someone who worked on it but aren't significant coverage of the movie. Glancing over the possibly LLM comment above the sources don't seem to actually mention the movie. --Here2rewrite (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: ignoring the LLM slop there could be some more discussion about this
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – I've been unable to find independent coverage online that goes into even minimal depth online. Of course, non of the article's current source achieve this, neither do the LLM-provided links above. – Aza24 (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Looked for reviews, did not find any. The fact that someone evidently very motivated to find them couldn't do better than what's shown above kind of suggests they aren't there to be found. M kuhner (talk) 04:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, unknown project. Geschichte (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

International Teaching University of Georgia

International Teaching University of Georgia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently short-lived private university in Tblisi. I can’t find in depth independent coverage in English and there isn’t an equivalent article in Georgian - perhaps sources exist but I can’t find them. Mccapra (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Georgia (country). Mccapra (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Most of the cited sources do not even mention this university, certainly non are non-trivial independent coverage. Definitely needs better sourcing to support an article. No other language Wiki articles linked to check for local sources. --Here2rewrite (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

2025 Indiana Hoosiers men's soccer team

2025 Indiana Hoosiers men's soccer team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Indiana Hoosiers men's soccer because it has negligible content that wouldn't otherwise be at the target. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Indiana. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• I propose to keep it as is, once the roster and schedule updates for the 2026/27 season there will be no place for the 2025 roster, schedule, and information. What content is negligible? I've since updated the article with more information not readily available in the main article, and I also closely followed the framework of other articles such as 2024 Virginia Cavaliers men's soccer team. Jkitch503 (talk) 02:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect as above. Does not need a separate article. GiantSnowman 07:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect per WP:NSEASON. Didn't win the Big Ten and was one and done in the NCAA Tournament. Publicwalrus (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  The article fits the notability guidelines for "including a post-season appearance in the top collegiate level". A team ranked number one at some point in the season can also be reasonably considered "elite", especially a team that produced several MLS draftees in recent seasons. Regardless of the outcome of the season, it meets notability guidelines for a standalone article. Jkitch503 (talk) 23:49, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep - I continue to support keeping this article. Since the original discussion, the article has been expanded to provide more comprehensive coverage of the 2025 season, including a lead and background section. These are season-specific historical details that would be difficult to incorporate into the main Indiana Hoosiers men's soccer article without either substantially expanding that article or losing useful information. The main Indiana Hoosiers men’s soccer article was also updated to include information related to the 2026 season’s roster and coaching staff, so merging would result in the loss of most of the information from the 2025 season.

Jkitch503 (talk) 04:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You only get one !vote. A relist vote isn't asking for repeat votes, it's informing that the discussion's time has been extended and that future participants should operate below this line. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Tanuj Khatri

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri
• Articles for deletion/Tanuj Khatri (2nd nomination)

Tanuj Khatri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NPOL. No significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:33, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 02:33, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete fails notability - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 04:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. The article is based on multiple independent reliable sources covering Tanuj Khatri's appointment as a State Information Commissioner of Jharkhand, including Hindustan Times, The Times of India, BHASKAR (NATIONAL HINDI NEWSPAPER), and the official Jharkhand State Information Commission website. I have added these references to verify the appointment and office. If there are specific notability concerns beyond the sourcing of this appointment, I would appreciate guidance on what additional independent coverage would be required. Ziyush (talk) 13:34, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

The Personnel Department issued a notification on Wednesday regarding the appointment of four new Information Commissioners in the State Information Commission. The appointments were made under Section 15(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, following Governor Santosh Kumar Gangwar's approval. The newly appointed Information Commissioners include Anuj Kumar Sinha, Tanuj Khatri, Amulya Neeraj Khalkho, and Shivpujan Pathak. Their tenure will be effective from the date they take oath. Their tenure will be valid for three years from the date of assuming office or until they attain the age of 65, whichever is earlier. The notification states that the arrival of Information Commissioners in the state will help expedite the disposal of pending cases. Earlier on Wednesday, the Governor gave his approval to the proposal submitted by the state government. Lok Bhavan reported that the Governor approved these appointments subject to certain conditions. He directed the government to ensure the prompt appointment of the Chief Information Commissioner to the Jharkhand State Information Commission. He also clarified that if any procedural error or question arises regarding compliance with Supreme Court orders in the appointment process for Information Commissioners, the state government will be held accountable. This is from one of the sources. Now can you please show me where is the significant coverage. Thilsebatti (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

The article has also been revised to improve neutrality by removing promotional language and ensuring that all significant claims are supported by reliable references. Any remaining editorial issues can be resolved through further improvement rather than deletion.

Based on the current sourcing, I believe the subject satisfies the requirements of WP:GNG, and I do not believe deletion is warranted. Therefore, I support Keep.

The article now includes independent coverage from:

The Times of India

Hindustan Times

LIVEHINDUSTAN

Dainik Bhaskar

Official Government of Jharkhand records (for factual verification only) Ziyush (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

The independent coverage which you are mentioning is mostly routine ones. For meeting GNG,we need significant coverage which is missing here. Thilsebatti (talk) 16:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Abdelnaser Abdelfatah

Abdelnaser Abdelfatah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The speedy was declined, but this fails any sort of notability. The sources seem to be just made up and contradict themselves on top of that. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Politicians, and Iran. Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. The sources don't seem to be reliable or significant, so I don't think that notability is established. There are also several pieces of nonsense, such as references which are in English or Spanish being described as "in Arabic", and dates which indicate that he was 10 or 11 years old when he received his doctorate. Of course any one of those could just be a mistake, but there are so many obviously false elements in the article that it becomes impossible to have any faith that any of it is reliable. Furthermore, the references don't actually support the content of the article to which they are attached. For example, the statement that Abdelnaser Abdelfatah is a businessperson, politician, and novelist has a citation to a web page which is just a list of rather trivial quotations from him, typical of which are "When the strong touch the happiness of the weak they will realize that their strength prestige and money are nothing but the strong is strong in mind faith love and affection and physical strength is not the same as true strength" and "Fear does not prevent death but it prevents life If you fear life has no value and if you die everything dies". Nowhere does it say anything about his being a politician or novelist. JBW (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Anis Ahmed (military officer)

Anis Ahmed (military officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. He is only briefly covered by independent reliable sources. BookishReader (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Caetano Alpha

Caetano Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. There is barely any significant coverage from reliable sources, with only mere mentions of the bus. SVcode(Talk) 19:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:42, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Saleh Uddin

Saleh Uddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. 0ximjub43r (talk) 23:03, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related AfD discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: notable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niasoh (talk • contribs) 12:47, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:15, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Tobol Tatars

Tobol Tatars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• draftify - Absolutely not ready for mainspace. I have no idea why its draft was accepted. --Altenmann >talk 23:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 23:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I don't really see a rationale from initial nominator, but in my opinion it seems fine as an article - nominator seems to be suggesting it's presentability that's a problem but it seems presentable to me. If nominator would like to share a little more about reasoning, i'd be happy to check from that perspective. Jishara (talk) 23:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

OK. Why I think it is not well-referenced:

• First ref "Tatar encyclopedia" says nothing, only mentions
• Second ref Трофимова Т.А is from 1947 is unverifiable, possibly outdated.
• Third ref Tataurov, Sergey is about Ayalyn Tatars whoever they are and tobolsk is mentioned in passing
• The section group has one footnote at the bottom a text from online journal fr:Cahiers du monde russe of unclear peer review, does diccuss "Tobol’sk Tatars and their sub-groups: 1) Aremzian-Nadtsi, 2) Isker-Tobol’sk, 3) Babasan, 4) Ishtiak-Tokuz," But it does not support the article text other than suggroup names.
• Genetics section:

  footnote Volkov, Vladimir does speak about genes of dome tobol tatar groups, but all this genetics hardly contribute for notabilyty per WP:PRIMARY, and there is no in-depth coverage of thes groups per WP:GNG. All this genetci stuff is highly tentative and must be cited from generalizing sources, not from some reporta aboyt a dozen of testd persons

concluding: not adequately sourced, very poor WP:SYNTH in marginal areas, a kind of accepted only by people who do not have a possibility to look in essence. We draftified articles even better than this one. --Altenmann >talk 00:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

So you're saying notability, then, is the concern, not presentability? Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Very little improvement was done since submission]. --@Kepler-1229b: - Altenmann >talk 00:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, it is long enough and well sourced.-Joseph (talk) 15:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
  • no it is not "well sourced" - did you read my detailed comments above? --Altenmann >talk 17:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

    There are 7 references. It is way more than Wikipedia average. Joseph (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

    When did refbombig become "well sourcing"? I can readily add a dosen more footnotes to texts that contain words "Tobolsk Tatars", so what? Please refresh your knowledge WP:GNG. --Altenmann >talk 19:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

    PS. "There is lies, gross lies and statistics" the report you cited is of exceptionally poor quality I even do not bother to comment. --Altenmann >talk 19:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was very tempted to draft this, the citations don't make a lot of sense but there appears to be some sources out there. But as it stands I think relisting might gain a couple more sets of eyes. Experienced editors would be most welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Khaled A. Beydoun

Khaled A. Beydoun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. I did WP:BEFORE and looked for book reviews for their 2018 book "American Islamophobia" and was able to find one in a peer reviewed journal but couldn't find another. There might be another out there, I did find a lot of commentary about the book and events/talks there were done when the book came out but not reviews.

For the eight criteria in WP:NACADEMIC

1. There work does not appear to have a significant impact within their discipline. Their top cited work American Islamophobia is only cited 439 times over eight years.
2. There are two awards mentioned the Frederick Douglass Educator Award and the Soros Equality Fellowship. Neither of these are prestigious national or international academic awards
3. They do not appear to be elected to an prestigious scholarly society
4. Their work does not appear to have a major impact on higher education across multiple institutions
5. Is not a distinguished or named full professor, is listed as an associate
6. Does not appear to be at the highest levels of academic leadership
7. Their work appears to have some impact outside of academia but the sources are all authored by himself
8. Does not appear to be a chief editor of a major academic journal

Just a note, it appears that the subject of this article is editing it so I've pinged them about the AfD @KhaledBeydoun:

Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Law. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Human appeal never paused any work with Khaled! They have been reaching out to work with him. Furthermore, human appeal put out a statement that continue to work with him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-43860-63 (talk) 02:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Michigan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Alethea Jane Macon

Alethea Jane Macon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My BEFORE shows a failure for NAUTHOR, NACADEMIC, and GNG. Jerod Lycett (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. Jerod Lycett (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Faridabad Model School

Faridabad Model School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:28, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Haryana. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 02:39, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Jain International Residential School

Jain International Residential School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Karnataka. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 02:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Jain Heritage School

Jain Heritage School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Karnataka. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 03:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Arignar Anna Government Arts and Science College, Karaikal

Arignar Anna Government Arts and Science College, Karaikal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 02:44, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Schools, and Science. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

List of Assassin's Creed characters

List of Assassin's Creed characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has gradually turned into a catalog of just about every named character who has appeared in an Assassin's Creed game, regardless of whether there is any real reason to cover them here. The page is now over 400 kB and tagged since 2013. We have individual entries for major protagonists alongside one-off NPCs, multiplayer characters, minor relatives, assassination targets and historical figures who happen to appear in a game. A lot of it is essentially plot summary.

I'm also not sure what the actual inclusion criterion is supposed to be at this point. Brotherhood, for example, has entries for characters like Angelina Ceresa and Margherita dei Campi. They can certainly be verified as existing, but that does not explain why they need an entry in an encyclopedic list of characters from a franchise this large. The same problem repeats throughout the page. See WP:SALAT and WP:NOTPLOT.

This has been discussed on the talk page for years. Others have been were already trying to cut down the plot material and minor characters since 2014, I raised splitting out the historical figures in 2022, and the more recent discussion has again raised both WP:TNT and splitting the casts by game. None of that has really solved the problem, and with every new game the list just gets larger. At this point I think starting again would probably be easier than trying to work out which parts of the existing 400 kB article should survive.

To be clear, I would also be open to Characters of Assassin's Creed [game] articles similar to the Final Fantasy character pages, where there is enough material about the cast's development and reception to support one. Likewise, there seems to be a reasonable subject in the way the series depicts historical figures, which could be dealt with in a separate, properly curated list rather than mixing hundreds of real and fictional people together here per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I don't see much value in keeping this version purely as a holding place for material which would need to be substantially culled and rewritten anyway. This would be without prejudice to somebody rebuilding the title later with an actual inclusion criterion, or creating more focused character articles where the sourcing supports them. Haleth (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Video games, and Lists. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 02:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)