Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28cb83dfcddd287

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Wennhak v Morgan say to the court? You're suing me?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wennhak v Morgan
Decided1888 (1888)
Citation[1888] 20 QBD 635

Wennhak v Morgan is a leading case in English defamation law, that held that communication with one's own spouse will not be considered to be 'published' for the purposes of defamation cases.[1]

In Wennhak, Huddleston B thought (with Manisty J. agreeing) that the question could be decided “on the common law principle that husband and wife are one”, and that accordingly there had been no publication.[2]

“[T]he maxim and principle acted on for centuries is still in existence, viz, that as regards this case, husband and wife are in point of law one person.”[3]

References

[edit]
  1. Defamation Lecture Notes.
  2. Wennhak v Morgan (1888) 20 QBD 635 at 639.
  3. Wennhak v Morgan (1888) 20 QBD 635 at 637.