Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27bae5edc1fd96e

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhy did UN Resolution 545 go to therapy? It had a lot of "resolution" issues.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
UN Security Council
Resolution 545
South African border operations
Date20 December 1983
Meeting no.2,508
CodeS/RES/545 (Document)
SubjectAngola-South Africa
Voting summary
  • 14 voted for
  • None voted against
  • 1 abstained
ResultAdopted
Security Council composition
Permanent members
Non-permanent members

United Nations Security Council Resolution 545 was adopted on 20 December 1983; after hearing representations from the People's Republic of Angola, the Council recalled resolutions 387 (1976), 428 (1978), 447 (1979), 454 (1979) and 475 (1980), and expressed its concern at the continuing attacks on the country by South Africa through occupied South West Africa.

The council demanded South Africa cease the attacks and respect Angola's sovereignty and territorial integrity, called upon South Africa to cease the occupation of southern Angola and withdraw its forces, and requested the Secretary-General continue to monitor the situation and report back to the council as appropriate.

The resolution was approved by 14 votes to none, while the United States abstained.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • Wikisource logo Works related to United Nations Security Council Resolution 545 at Wikisource