Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21d08c67d97689d

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the uncertainty coefficient say? "I'm not sure.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In statistics, the uncertainty coefficient, also called proficiency, entropy coefficient or Theil's U, is a measure of nominal association. It was first introduced by Henri Theil[citation needed] and is based on the concept of information entropy.

Definition

[edit]

Suppose we have samples of two discrete random variables, X and Y. By constructing the joint distribution, PX,Y(x, y), from which we can calculate the conditional distributions, PX|Y(x|y) = PX,Y(x, y)/PY(y) and PY|X(y|x) = PX,Y(x, y)/PX(x), and calculating the various entropies, we can determine the degree of association between the two variables.

The entropy of a single distribution is given as: [1]

while the conditional entropy is given as:[1]

The uncertainty coefficient[2] or proficiency[3] is defined as:

and tells us: given Y, what fraction of the bits of X can we predict? In this case we can think of X as containing the total information, and of Y as allowing one to predict part of such information.

The above expression makes clear that the uncertainty coefficient is a normalised mutual information I(X;Y). In particular, the uncertainty coefficient ranges in [0, 1] as I(X;Y) < H(X) and both I(X,Y) and H(X) are positive or null.

Note that the value of U (but not H!) is independent of the base of the log since all logarithms are proportional.

The uncertainty coefficient is useful for measuring the validity of a statistical classification algorithm and has the advantage over simpler accuracy measures such as precision and recall in that it is not affected by the relative fractions of the different classes, i.e., P(x). [4] It also has the unique property that it won't penalize an algorithm for predicting the wrong classes, so long as it does so consistently (i.e., it simply rearranges the classes). This is useful in evaluating clustering algorithms since cluster labels typically have no particular ordering.[3]

Variations

[edit]

The uncertainty coefficient is not symmetric with respect to the roles of X and Y. The roles can be reversed and a symmetrical measure thus defined as a weighted average between the two:[2]

Although normally applied to discrete variables, the uncertainty coefficient can be extended to continuous variables[1] using density estimation.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 Claude E. Shannon; Warren Weaver (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.
  2. 1 2 William H. Press; Brian P. Flannery; Saul A. Teukolsky; William T. Vetterling (1992). "14.7.4". Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 761.
  3. 1 2 White, Jim; Steingold, Sam; Fournelle, Connie. "Performance Metrics for Group-Detection Algorithms" (PDF). Interface 2004. Archived from the original on April 13, 2012. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. Peter, Mills (2011). "Efficient statistical classification of satellite measurements" (PDF). International Journal of Remote Sensing. 32 (21): 6109–6132. arXiv:1202.2194. Bibcode:2011IJRS...32.6109M. doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.507795. S2CID 88518570. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-26.
[edit]
  • libagf Includes software for calculating uncertainty coefficients.