Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a238159f2902ecfa

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did the Triangle of Opposition say? "I'm opposed to being angled.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the system of Aristotelian logic, the triangle of opposition is a diagram[which?] representing the different ways in which each of the three propositions of the system is logically related ('opposed') to each of the others. The system is also useful in the analysis of syllogistic logic, serving to identify the allowed logical conversions from one type to another.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, other triangles were proposed, including Nicolai A. Vasiliev's triangle,[1] the Jespersenian Triangle, Ginzberg’s triangle of contraries and Sir William Hamilton’s subcontraries.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Bazhanov, Valentin (January 31, 2008). "Non-Classical Stems from Classical: N. A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and his Reassessment of the Square of Opposition (Book review)". Philosophy Documentation Center. Retrieved 2024-03-05.
  2. Horn, Laurence (January 31, 2010). "Histoire d'*O: Lexical Pragmatics and the Geometry of Opposition" (PDF). Yale University. Retrieved 2024-03-05.
[edit]

Philosophy Documentation Center website A Triangle of Opposites for Types of Propositions in Aristotelian Logic, by Paul Jacoby, published in The New Scholasticism (Volume 24, Issue 1, January 1950, pages 32-56)