Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23899072978b965

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Tokuitsu say to its date? "You suit me.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tokuitsu (徳一) (781?-842?) was a scholar-monk of East Asian Yogācāra in Japanese Buddhism. He is best known for his debates with other leading Buddhists of the time, Kūkai and Saichō, and for asserting a more orthodox Mahayana view based on the state-sanctioned schools of Nara.

Biography

[edit]

Little is known about Tokuitsu's early life, but records state that he studied East Asian Yogācāra doctrine at an early age at Kōfuku-ji, then later Tōdai-ji. His teacher is believed to be the eminent scholar Shūen (769-834). Saichō writes that Tokuitsu left the capital at age 20, and resided in the outer provinces in eastern Japan, apparently at the temples of Chūzen-ji in Tsukuba and Enichi-ji in Aizu. The bulk of his writings were concerned with challenging the Ekayana, Tiantai doctrines espoused by Saichō. Where Saichō advocated the notion of universal buddhahood in all beings, Tokuitsu countered with the orthodox Hossō view that buddhahood is not inherent in all beings, but can be awakened through the Dharma. In time, the debate grew heated, and insults were exchanged with Saichō criticizing Tokuitsu as "one who eats only coarse, meager food", an allusion to the Pratimokṣa monastic precepts, while Tokuitsu criticized the patriarch of Tendai Buddhism, Zhiyi, of being a "country rustic".

By contrast, Tokuitsu's correspondence with Kūkai was more cordial, but Tokuitsu's letters expressed great interest, persistent confusion, and doubt about Kūkai's teachings on the Dharmakāya. Kūkai, in deference to Tokuitsu's authority, adopted a more humble, conciliatory tone and sought to assert the validity of his esoteric-only teachings. Tokuitsu conceded some points to Kūkai's argument, but remained unconvinced otherwise.

References

[edit]
  • Abe, Ryuichi (1999). The Weaving of Mantra: Kukai and the Construction of Esoteric Buddhist Discourse. Columbia University Press. pp. 204–228. ISBN 0-231-11286-6.
  • Ford, James L. (2006). Jokei and Buddhist Devotion in Early Medieval Japan. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 47–50. ISBN 0-19-518814-4.