Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44f570e3b3bdbb4

Jump to content

Template talk:Wikipedia article editnotice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sdkb in topic Styling

Origin

[edit]

This template came about from Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Linking_to_projectspace_in_articles. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

This seems reasonable but you added the template to a page that links to the probject page on purpose a few times. Have no problem if the wording is changed but let's not tag a page with this if you know the linkage is done onpurpose.--Moxy 🍁 02:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Moxy, don't create a WP:TALKFORK; the discussion is happening there. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 03:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
So don't talk about this template here at this templates talk page. Talk were ever makes you warm fuzzy.--Moxy 🍁 03:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A few changes I've made

[edit]

See Special:Diff/1289930887 and Special:Diff/1289931313. I've reworded the statement in the editnotice, since the essay, "Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source" has changed to "Wikipedia:Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia". Overall, I think it is more clear of what it is saying. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 19:24, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Styling

[edit]

@Izno, I tend to find that editnotices without any styling almost universally get ignored. Would it be possible for you to make the styling dark mode-compatible rather than removing it? Sdkb talk 18:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

There is no way to provide the same styling as you did and make it dark mode compatible without employing TemplateStyles (see how). You are more than free to do that if you think this template deserves that. If not, I would suggest advocating for adjusting the default edit notice background, which of course carries its own drawbacks, some of which I'm sure you're aware, having previously advocated against the morass of talk page templates IIRC. Izno (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, while I might want some sort of default styling for editnotices, I don't think this is the place for that. I'm not familiar enough with TemplateStyles to be able to easily figure out to use it in this instance. The desired state is presumably to have the gradient appear as it was for light mode and to have a dark background with light text for dark mode. Would you be able to help show me how to do that? Sdkb talk 20:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
... I also honestly don't think gradients have any place in a modern UI either. TemplateStyles isn't hard, take a shot at it and report back if something doesn't make sense. Izno (talk) 23:22, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
I also honestly don't think gradients have any place in a modern UI either. I'm afraid I've got some bad news... Sdkb talk 18:47, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay, so I tried figuring out TemplateStyles, and ended up with this (CSS), which isn't working normally, let alone trying to add in the night mode compatibility. What am I doing wrong? Sdkb talk 19:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply