Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253632f7a5d90c0

Jump to content

Template talk:WikiProject Iowa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by MSGJ in topic Update

B-class criteria

[edit]

I added the ability of the template to track B-Class criteria (using the "B-Class-n=" parameters), borrowing from {{WPMILHIST}} and {{WPGR}}. I've also left instructions in the template on how to use these new parameters (hopefully these are less intrusive than the ones at {{WPMILHIST}}) and added them to the documentation. --Tim4christ17 talk 12:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

C-Class compatibility added. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Update

[edit]

I've put a new version of the template on the sandbox which uses {{WPBM}}. Would there be any concerns about using it? There would be no loss of functionality. A couple of questions:

  1. Is the B-class checklist actually desired? There is no mention of it on the project's assessment scale.
  2. The flag parameter does not seem to be used. (The corresponding category does not even exist.) Do you want it? Or would it be better to use the more common attention parameter?

 Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me! I have no preferences as to flag v. attention, though I would prefer we keep the B-class checklist. The points on the checklist are required for B-Class according to our assessment scale, so this provides a useful guide for users upgrading the status of the article. And it is hidden, so it isn't taking up space on the talk page. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Come to think of it, I'd forgotten there even was a "flag" parameter. I wouldn't be opposed to removal completely. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
 Done. I removed flag as suggested.  Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply