Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21c9937bbfd962d

Jump to content

Template talk:Mathematical programming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Kiefer.Wolfowitz in topic Textbook models

This is a nice start. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Organization

[edit]

I would suggest (at least) 5 main categories:

  • Mathematical Foundations: Well-posed probems (existence and uniqueness, continuity of solutions w.r.t problem data), perturbation and sensitivity analysis (growth functions).
    • partially ordered sets and lattices, Tarski's fixed-point theorem;
    • complete metric spaces, closed graphs, convergence (perhaps including summability), Lipschitz continuity, contraction mappings, fixed point theorem of Banach, Kantorovich inequality;
    • Convex and quasi-convex functions, inf compactness;
    • matroids and greedy algorithms, oriented matroids, submodularity.
  • Problem Classes (by popularity or by some categorical scheme, since LCP covers QP covers LP, etc.)
  • Principles: objective functions, constraints, relaxations, penalty functions, Lagrangian function, duality thories.
  • Computations
    • Algorithm complexity and problem complexity; convergence rates.
    • Iterative Methods versus Algorithms versus Heuristics (Nelder-Meade simplex heuristic) [and then subtypes]),
  • Applications or Modeling.

It would be useful to examine the classification systems of Mathematical Reviews (MSC) and the Computer Scientists, for inspiration. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Textbook models

[edit]

Perhaps it would be useful to adapt the organization of some comprehensive books from the 1970s, like those of Michel Minoux and Fisher (MIT)? (I'm trying to spur discussion.)Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply