Template talk:Infobox train
Add topicLatest comment: 1 month ago by Edgar Searle in topic Remove UIC and AAR wheel arrangements
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
Owner
[edit]I think it should say who owns each train i.e. Porterbrook owns the Class 458, 460, 158 and 159 units, just to pick 4 examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdiddyjr (talk • contribs) 15:58, 10 April 2012
Wrong Multiple Working
[edit]The Multiple Working linked is likely too specific as it is the British Multiple Working. This should probably be changed to Multiple-unit train control to be more generic and applicable properly to trains outside Great Britain. Object-Concept (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is almost a year old, but
Done with this edit. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 23:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Remove UIC and AAR wheel arrangements
[edit]The UIC and AAR wheel arrangement systems are only useful on locomotives. Remove them, as they are too long to be classified on trainsets and multiple units ~2026-30173-94 (talk) 02:42, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Not going to happen - Everyone has discussed it with you several times; it is an important aspect also for EMUs and can be useful in term of number of traction wheels and traction distribution. Please don't ask or do it again. Edgar Searle (talk) 06:35, 12 June 2026 (UTC)