Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. This particular template is especially important to the project because it is used in the maintenance of other templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates
Latest comment: 7 months ago13 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Move this template to {{Format link}} and blank and redirect {{Format linkr}} to {{Format link}}, per TfD discussion linked in the first banner on this talk page. I have checked all of the existing uses of {{format link}} to see if they need to retain underscores (except the Talk:, User (talk):, and (Article) namespaces, as they should not retain underscores or checking wouldn't be worth the effort) and haven't seen any uses of intentional underscores. FaviFake (talk) 16:27, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Rjjiii The TfD merely ended with consensus to move the code to the better name and redirect {{format linkr}} to there. I agree that such a parameter should not be added, but that can be discussed elsewhere.Template:format link has several other parameters not present in this template; does this template support any of those? Both templates are wrappers for the same module. All parameters from their parent module should work the same. FaviFake (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I'm not sure I understood the problem here though. Doesn't the fact that they both wrap around the same module mean their parameters are identical? FaviFake (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
There probably isn't a problem, but we should check some existing uses of {{format link}} first. {{Format linkr}} calls two modules to format the output of Module:Format link: Module:Urldecode formats URLs and Module:String is used by {{replace}} to remove underscores. These likely don't but might cause some problem in existing uses. I've completed the TemplateData for both templates. When the usage report updates in a couple weeks we can check the changes against those pages. While we wait, I've done some of the updates needed at Template:Format link/doc; if you want, you can go ahead and draft the post-merge documentation page (in a sandbox or offline). Also, I don't think that we can "blank and redirect" the current {{format link}} because it has a lengthy history. The process described at Wikipedia:Merging (thanks btw for cleaning that page up) seems more appropriate: copy and paste this template to {{format link}} with an edit summary, credit User:Psiĥedelisto in the edit summary, redirect this template, handle subpages, etc. Rjjiii (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your explanation.Also, I don't think that we can "blank and redirect" the current Yeah, I meant to do exactly what you described but simplified it a bit too much:) FaviFake (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply