Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226642e9a84cf56

Jump to content

Template talk:Discuss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Jae in topic This template shouldn't exist at all.

"Section is the optional section within the Talk page"

[edit]

I am having difficulty in making the Section syntax of the [discuss] template do what I want it to do. There is no information in this Template Article on how to use this (examples). Thus, I am not only asking for assistance, but also for clarification within this template article.

I will provide an example: I found an issue in The Ren & Stimpy Show article. I wrote a new section in that article's Talk page. Now, I'm adding the [discuss] tag to the section of the article I'm trying to bring attention to. However, I can't seem to make the Section syntax link to the new section in the article's talk page. I've tested different ways to type the article link and previewed the results, but it continues to default to the top of the Talk page instead. What do I need to do to link to the new section on the Talk page?
Christopher, Salem, OR (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

This template shouldn't exist at all.

[edit]

It goes against the WP:NOR principle, sorry, "guideline" of Wikipedia.

Discuss ;-)

Seriously though: isn't this always used for "fishing for sources" for what is in principle "original research"? In that it's only there if you write something that you have no sources for, but you think is true, so you link to the talk page hoping someone will add some sources? If you have reliable sources, a "discuss" is completely unneeded. jae (talk) 16:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply