Template talk:Collective intelligence
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by 70.15.11.211
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2017 October 8. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This template has so many issues.
- 1. The title probably isn't the most appropriate label for this collection of articles.
- 2. Several of the articles could easily be merged.
- 3. The template itself is likely original research.
- 4. As per issue 3, what the template should or should not contain is highly subjective and overly reliant on participating editors to arrive at a unique and original consensus thereof.
- 5. The template isn't being used by more than the one article that happens to have the same name, making it a fancy "see also" template for the top of that one article.
What do you think?
- I think the template should be deleted or renamed (Collective intelligence has the most robust article and weightiest meaning, top down it's more relevant), and atleast a couple of the articles should be merged (but that's a side issue tangentially related to this template). 70.15.11.211 (talk) 15:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC)