Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26706730be736cd

Jump to content

// Workers AI · dad joke modeWhat did Tate v Williamson case say to lunch? You're sued for the bill.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tate v Williamson
CourtHouse of Lords
Citation(1886) LR 2 Ch App 55
Case opinions
Lord Chelmsford
Keywords
Undue influence

Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 is an English contract law case relating to undue influence.

Facts

[edit]

The defendant became the financial adviser to an Oxford University undergraduate who sold him his estate for half its value and then drank himself to death, aged 24. The executors applied for the transaction to be set aside.

Judgment

[edit]

Lord Chelmsford held that the executors would be successful in setting the contract aside. ‘The jurisdiction exercised by courts of equity over the dealings of persons standing in certain fiduciary relations has always been regarded as one of the most salutary description… The courts have always been careful not to fetter this jurisdiction by defining the exact limits of its exercise.’

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]