Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a250c780eed15751

Jump to content

Talk:Zyayda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Skitash in topic Origin of the Zyayda tribe

Origin of the Zyayda tribe

[edit]

Skitash, the source that you defend is a self-published blog, which is neither published by a professional researcher nor by a journalist, it is advisable to keep the source that I defend on the one hand, because it is a reliable source (Document and ethnological information) and that it was published under the auspices of the Faculty of Letters and Humanities French, and the General Residence of France in Morocco. With this message I take the liberty again to modify the associated page, while waiting for your answer. Samso231 (talk) 06:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

While that's true, blogs can be used in certain cases when the website "is known in the relevant subject circles as a source or authority", especially when reliable sources on the topic are scarce. However, your source is extremely outdated, dating back to 1907, and it doesn't even mention Zyayda. I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:BRD and refrain from edit warring to push your point of view. Skitash (talk) 12:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
In fact the source does not speak about Ziaida because it is not the good one, the one mentioning the tribe is ‘https://archive.org/details/villesettribusdu02missuoft/page/52/mode/2up’. The argument that the source is too old is not correct for me, the tribal system today in Morocco is archaic, many tribes having dispersed, can we still speak of ‘tribes’ properly speaking?
Is there still a tribal identity and organisation today? In any case, this was the case in the past and, in my opinion, this is why an older source concerning the tribes prevails over a modern source. Samso231 (talk) 13:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
What's more, here's a more modern source that proves that the Ziaida are indeed Sanhadja Berbers. It's the gateway to the town of Benslimane, the tribe's chief town : https://archive.wikiwix.com/cache/index2.php?rev_t=20150824100052&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.benslimane.ma%2Fhistorique.html#federation=archive.wikiwix.com&tab=url Samso231 (talk) 13:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The "modern source" in question links to a passing mention on a Moroccan town's website that no longer exists. This is clearly not a credible source. As I've already said, a French colonial-era source that's over 100 years old cannot be considered reliable. See WP:AGE MATTERS. If you continue to edit war, I will have no choice but to report you. Skitash (talk) 16:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
In the absence of a reply, I'm taking the liberty of modifying the page again and the one associated with the Arab tribes. Samso231 (talk) 10:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply