Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4493914aa741709

Jump to content

Talk:Zemstvo/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 days ago by Czarking0 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 02:47, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Reverosie (talk · contribs) 14:00, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I will be your reviewer. After I reached out to you about GARC, you left me a message that really made me think. Your R/G ratio, like mine, is very high, yet you've been waiting for a review all summer now. While I do not know much about the topic of your article, I am excited to learn in order to give you the review you deserve after waiting so long and doing so much for other editors. I am busy today, but I can't tell you exactly when the review will start since I'm able to find patches of time; either way, this weekend will probably see the majority of my progress. Hopefully waiting one more day is better than a few more months. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:00, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I hope that if you have any interest in Russian history or the history of municipal government this will be an interesting article for you. Czarking0 (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A potentially review-ending issue

[edit]

Just skimming the article, there appears to be a massive and potentially catastrophic issue: This article relies all but exclusively on only one source.

While it is usually not a major issue for a GA's in-line citations to favor one source over the others (an example of this is the reviewed version of this article), what prevents that from being review-ending is the fact that there are other sources backing things up.

This article, however, relies on just one source for absolutely everything there. If this cannot be fixed and you cannot add more sources to the article, I may have no choice but to fail you on your absolute reliance on only one source. Please let me know when more sources are added or if you cannot find any. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:35, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm not going to be pushy here since I see that you've been making progress on adding sources. Excellent work! I'm happy to wait until you are done. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hey sorry for some reason I have not gotten any notifications about this review. Usually I do. I'll take a look today Czarking0 (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it's ok! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:17, 25 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have tried to add some sources. I really think the sources I have used are the best sources. I don't want to add much more. Czarking0 (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Reverosie: thoughts ? Czarking0 (talk) 04:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply