Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a228c3419f88b36e

Jump to content

Talk:Zaslin Active Protection System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 37.120.49.149 in topic questionable sentence

questionable sentence

[edit]

This "However, it will not shield against hollow-charge artillery shells or armor-piercing sub-caliber shells which have thicker walls than grenades or TRG projectiles." lacks a source and sounds nonsensical. There are practically no hollow-charge artillery shells. The very few that exist would not be relevant. Maybe hollow charge (shaped charge) tank gun shots were meant. But tit's generally unlikely that thick walls are the issue (as shaped charge ammunitions hardly ever have thick shell walls around the shaped charge. The issue might rather be the velocity of around 900 m/s that might leave too little time to react (and affect) for the system. 37.120.49.149 (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply