Talk:Your Power

Release dates

Under the above mentioned section, it is stated that the song was released in Italy on April 30, 2021 through UMG, but the cited source says it was released by EMI. Am I missing something? dxneo (talk) 10:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Dxneo: EMI is owned by UMG. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 12:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Okay Cybertrip. However, here it clearly states that "Lunch" was sent to radio by UMG and not any of its subsidiaries. Why isn't UMG on the infobox if this was the case? Yes, it is the parent company but it does not take credit for everything. An artist can be signed to UMG for distribution and Sony for management. dxneo (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

FAR notice

The article is not being properly maintained and there seem to be a number of issues. The release dates in some countries are not mentioned in the prose at all. The credits to the masterers and mixers also find no mention in the actual article text. The commercial performance section is outdated, for some reason only covering certifications "as of April 2024". Most certifications like Brazil, Denmark, France, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, and Spain find no mention in that section, which puzzlingly focuses on irrelevant one-week figures instead. Entire performances are completely missing a mention in the article. So it fails the featured article criteria 1b and 1c. As it stands, this will be moved to featured article review in a few weeks if things don't change substantially. NØ 19:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

• @MaranoFan: Have your concerns been resolved? If not, would you like to nominate this to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

• @Z1720: Unfortunately, the article has not been touched at all with regards to addressing my concerns. So yes, this should not be an FA in its current condition.--NØ 03:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

• @MaranoFan: In that case, can you nominate this to WP:FAR? I would do it myself but FAR only lets editors nominate an article once a week, with a maximum of five nominations open at one time, so it would take a long time for me to nominate it. Also, if you nominate the article you can describe the concerns more effectively than I. Z1720 (talk) 14:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

  pinging @PSA:, the main editor. 750h+ 20:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

• @PSA: Any comments on the above? @MaranoFan: if your concerns are not resolved, can you bring this to WP:FAR? You will be able to explain your concerns more effectively than other editors. Z1720 (talk) 21:38, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

• The reason I am not bringing this to FAR is because the nominator is active and actively writing and nominating new FACs and FLCs. I am sure they will quickly address my concerns if this is FAR'd. The only question that remains, then, is why they aren't doing it now?--NØ 02:38, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

• @MaranoFan: Wikipedia is a volunteer service and editors can choose the article they want to edit, as well as which conversations they want to participate in. If PSA doesn't want to edit this article, that is their choice and they do not have to give us an explanation. Z1720 (talk) 02:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

• Z1720, do not ping me here again. I do not have any interest in taking this forward. Thanks.--NØ 04:16, 16 May 2025 (UTC)