Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f06de8865b1a9

Jump to content

Talk:Yoddha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Wbm1058 in topic Requested move 22 September 2017

Requested move 22 September 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply



Yoddha (disambiguation)Yoddha – Unnecessary disambiguation. — Zawl 10:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • It's a kind of mess. Both Yoddha and Yodha redirect to Yodha (1992 film), and PlutoniumBackToTheFuture asserted in edit summary that The 1992 film named Yodha is a cult-classic that remains an integral part of pop culture after 25 years. 'Yodha' and 'Yoddha' should be directed to the page of..., which seems a reasonable WP:PRIMARYTOPIC claim, but then, that should be moved to Yod(d)ha. I'll leave a notice at WP:INDIA. No such user (talk) 13:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support move. The terms Yodha and Yoddha (as well as variants yōddhā, yōd'dhā, yoddhā, etc.) appear to be derivatives of the Hindi word for warrior (see wikt:योद्धा). All variants should redirect to a disambiguation page titled Yoddha, not to any particular film. The argument that the 1992 film's popularity makes it a primary topic is weak: the film Jaws is an integral part of American pop culture, yet there are many things called jaws. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as per the nom, really unnecessary. Lorstaking (talk) 02:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.