Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229ea4bbd14f43c

Jump to content

Talk:Yeshiva Toras Chaim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pzussman in topic Just a thought

Questions

[edit]

To whomever runs that bot that came through here, this is definately an orthodox yeshiva. A litvak one to be specific.

I'm condused. The people who the page says are the leaders of the yeshiveh dont make sense. R' Yisroel Meir Kagan ZT"L, and R' Yitzchok Wassereman ZT"L are both niftar. They are leaders of the dor before the shoah. Have a gut yuntiff. --Shaul avrom 23:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi Shaul avrom: The rabbis you mention are different to their two namesakes in Europe. They are legit and it's just one of those things that this yeshiva's leaders have famous names. How many "Menachem Mendels" are there by now? IZAK
  • The name of Rabbi Kagan is indeed, the exact same name of the Chofetz Chaim (R' Yisroel Meir Hakohen Kagan), who was niftar in the early nineteen thirties. The Rosh Yeshiva of Toras Chaim is not related to the Chofetz Chaim, zt"l. Rav Elchonon Bunim Wasserman, Hy"d, was a close talmid of the Chofetz Chaim who was murdered by the Nazis in the Ninth Fort outside the Kovno Getto in 1942 (I believe). The current Rosh Yeshiva, Rav Yitzchok Wasserman, is not related to Rav Elchonon Bunim Wasserman. Hope that clarifies things. Pzussman —Preceding undated comment added 15:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC).Reply

Just a thought

[edit]

If this page is about two institutions, shouldn't there be two pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.148.18 (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply