Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245f1bd88132a83

Jump to content

Talk:Yarikh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Mastakos in topic Phoenician and Punic sources

Phoenician and Punic sources

[edit]

This section has two long paragraphs to say that there is no evidence for Yarikh being worshiped or even known, save for one mention of a theophoric name. This seems unnecessary and misleading.

I think this entire section should be removed or reduced to one or two sentences. Anyone else have an opinion?

For that matter, the following two sections likewise use many words to say there is little or no evidence for Yarikh worship. The Palmyrene section is shorter, but confirms there is no evidence at all for Yarikh worship, using a whole paragraph to say he wasn't worshipped there.

The entire "1st Millennium BC" section - some 9 or 10 paragraphs - could easily have all relevant information in a single paragraph, or perhaps two - one for possible worship, one for "no worship". Mastakos (talk) 11:46, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply