Talk:Yantacaw Brook

Yantacaw Brook Park, New JerseyYantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 21 January 2018 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yantacaw Brook Park

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There is no reason to repeat material about brook in park section. There is no reason to ad redundant information in infobox. There is no reason to keep dead links. There is no basis for keeping OR.Djflem (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Djflem:, it is my understanding that it is generally considered against WP:CONSENSUS for an editor to unilaterally remove material that has been added as the result of a discussion. In this case, the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey called for at least some portion of the material on the old page to be added here. Your removal based on your personal opinion seems to demonstrate an WP:OWNERSHIP attitude. Please expand on why you believe the previous discussion was incorrect. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is my understandng that people read what they are adding to Wikipedia. Once you've reviewed the entire article, can you get back to this talk page about why you would believe the information you're adding is relevent, useful, helpful, interesting, correctly placed, referenced, etc. Please explain how it is an addtion/improvement to the piece and not just a repetition of what is already in it? ThanksDjflem (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Yantacaw Brook

Yantacaw Brook Park