Talk:Yae Miko

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yae Miko/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gommeh (talk · contribs) 02:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Ivebeenhacked (talk · contribs) 19:48, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I will start reviewing Yae Miko for the GA status. I will drop comments within the next few days. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:48, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Lead

She debuted in version 2.0 of the game in 2021 and became playable in 2022. - It would be wise to say that she was an NPC in 2021, something like: She debuted in version 2.0 of the game in 2021 as a non-playable character (NPC) and became playable in 2022.

 Done with the exception of the "NPC" in parenthesis. No need for that IMO. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Her appearance is similar to that of Yae Sakura, a character from Honkai Impact 3rd which was also developed by miHoYo. - A comma belongs after "Honkai Impact 3rd" and remove "which was" because it seems redundant. So: Her appearance is similar to that of Yae Sakura, a character from Honkai Impact 3rd, also developed by miHoYo.

Reworded to sound a little more natural. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, that also seems fine. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:43, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Creation and design

At 11:30 PM on December 31, 2021, - I'd specify on the time zone to be more accurate.

I think I'll just get rid of the time entirely, as it is not important. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

That's also fine. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:04, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Appearances

Doesn't seem to be anything wrong here.

Reception

Soon afterward, fan-made illustrations and 3D character models began circulating online. - I suggest linking Fan labor into "fan-made illustrations".

I think it's better to just link Fan art there instead, as that's what "fan-made illustrations" are. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:32, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Several of them drew fan art or engaged in other creative works to celebrate her release - I also suggest linking Fan art into "fan art".

Not going to link it there as I don't want to repeat the link. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:32, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Citations

As of Special:Diff/1336405190, citation #16, #18, and #33 are duplicate citations of each other. Even #17 and #46 are duplicate citations of each other as well. Fix it using "<ref name=''>".

I think I got them all. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 16:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Images

As of Special:Diff/1337854913, the fair use images are correctly under Wikipedia guidelines along with appropriate caption with adequate quantity.

Earwig's Copyvio Detector

Earwig says 5.7% violation unlikely so nothing's wrong here.

Final result

There doesn't seem to be anything else wrong with the article so I'm gonna be passing this.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.