Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2400b657cd9de81

Jump to content

Talk:Y-intercept

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wcherowi in topic Ordinate Intercept

Untitled

[edit]

Why Y why not Q?

Historical reasons. Back when "modern" algebraic symbolism was introduced in the 16th Century or so, "x" was chosen to represent the unknown variable. So "y", being the next letter, is naturally your second variable. Specifically in the case of "y-intercept", it's probably Descartes' fault. --Bth 15:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Root (mathematics)

[edit]

Mentioning Root (mathematics) would be a great addition to the article. --Abdull 15:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Formula

[edit]

The formula for Y-Intercept would be a nice add-on —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ianboy13 (talkcontribs) 01:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Fixed redlink in article

[edit]

In the last paragraph, the text I/V-characteristic linked to... nothing! So I fixed it, linked it to Current-voltage characteristic, and added an explanation of the use of I as a variable. Please discuss before making any reverts relating to this edit!

Thanks,

The Doctahedron, 02:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

sounds more complex than it needs to be

[edit]

This article reads like someone wanted to try to impress everyone. I remember seeing descriptions/definitions in textbooks less puffed up than this article. Did a lawyer write this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.47.30.187 (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Expansion of this article with citations, examples and images

[edit]

Hiya. Firstly, I want to thank the editors for all of the useful information contained in this article. I am not very good at remembering all the bits and pieces so when I went to translate it, this was great. When working on the translation, I research citations and added examples and created images. The result in English is at User:Lfahlberg/sb_y-intercept. (BTW: Rows of 4 images look good on a tablet or ipad and on a regular computer monitor, but 4 did not cover the examples I thought important, so I made 8. I am a visual learner and images are easy to understand (and easy to translate) and so am big on images.) Please tell me what you think about this proposal. Also, I was unsure about the See also list and the Categories (I would love categories Basic Functions, Basic Algebra, but they do not exist). Thank-you for reading. Lfahlberg (talk) 14:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ordinate Intercept

[edit]

Can the y-intercept also be called the ordinate intercept.

The ordinate is the vertical axis and the y-intercept is the vertical intercept. So, I believe the term ordinate intercept will also make sense.

--NK (talk) 09:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

The ordinate is the second coordinate of a coordinate pair in the Cartesian system. It is not the name of the vertical axis (or y-axis). So this would not really make any sense. Also, even if it did work, Wikipedia would not be the place to bring it up as there would be no reference for it. --Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
It is commonly used. wumbolo ^^^ 21:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Interesting. All the references were from science journals and I didn't see any from math articles. My own perspective is from mathematics and I was unaware of these, what I would call, misuses of terminology. References could probably be found, but not in the mathematics literature. --Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply