Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xun Lei Chong article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
this article is not up to wikipedia standards. It reports dubious claims from a single, unverified source as facts. It is impossible to estabilish if any of the claims about this weapon are factual or indeed if it was ever used in combat. "For this radical design, the five thin gun barrels are connected behind a reinforced shield: like the five thunder divine machine the gunner could rotate the fuse 72 degrees and swiftly light each barrel with his match" is celebratory and not enciclopedic. The relevance of the whole thing is dubious. 139.18.1.5 (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply