Talk:Xerox art
Add topicLatest comment: 19 years ago by 159.148.42.93 in topic untitled
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
untitled
[edit]It is a question about whether computer scanners (similar in function to photocopiers but not photocopiers) are part of Xerox art. What do others have to say about this? --Daniel C. Boyer 16:39, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Should ghost be linked from "ghostly"? I think this is a real stretch. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:36, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- I delinked it. Perhaps if the ghost page was disambiguated to explain this term it would be ok, but then this is not a dictionary, so maybe a Wiktionary link would be better. Angela 18:23, Oct 9, 2003 (UTC)
What's the name of a technique when you take a picture, make a copy of it, then make a copy of copy, and so on until the picture disappears (becomes black or white) - and then declare these series of pictures an art? --159.148.42.93 08:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)