Talk:Xerox
Add topic| Xerox received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Palo Alto Research Center
[edit]"Apple instead bought rights to the Alto GUI and adapted it into a more..."
no clue where anyone got that, but it isn't factual. I notice there is no citation for it either. 99.33.126.209 (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's a lazy way of saying that jobs acquired certain concepts from parc in exchange for letting them in on the ground floor as apple investors.
- puzzling how many innovations came out of parc & weren't recognised as potentially lucrative- one wonders if this was internal politics or a corporate vision in denial- "there's no way these networked computer things will ever replace good old photocopiers" kind of thing.
- no room in the article for cultural significance or references?
- [leaves thread whistling adam ant's "zerox machine"] duncanrmi (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- the potentially useful citation is a few sentences earlier ("they just had no idea what they had"), #86, but is a WSJ article behind a paywall. good old wp. it accept that as a citation despite us not being able to read it, but if wozniak himself came on here, he'd have the wp police all over him faster than... well, I'd probably better not finish that thought....
- incidentally, there's a separate dedicated article about PARC which seems to be less informative than the PARC section here. duncanrmi (talk) 23:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Computation, Culture, and Society
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2026 and 3 June 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Takeshi Misaki (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Haloid phase out
[edit]While Haloid's core focus on photographic supplies lasted for decades, the commercial availability of Haloid-branded photo paper ceased as the company completely pivoted to automated plain-paper copying following the massive success of the Xerox 914.
Xerox never sold Haloid's traditional photographic paper and chemical divisions to another company. Instead, the company internally phased out its legacy B&W photo products in the 1960s to focus on commercial xerography, ~2026-36700-19 (talk) 19:47, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Connecticut articles
- Low-importance Connecticut articles
- WikiProject Connecticut articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class New York (state) articles
- Unknown-importance New York (state) articles
- C-Class Western New York articles
- Low-importance Western New York articles
- WikiProject Western New York
