Talk:Xenosaga Episode II/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Freikorp in topic GA Review
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 04:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- "with both a human party and mechs" - this will probably be very confusing to non-gamers. It's somewhat confusing to me as I don't know what constitutes a "mech" within the game. The gameplay section doesn't expand on what one is either.
- "to encage them" - I assume this should say 'engage' :)
- I'd wikilink "cutscenes" in the gameplay section.
- "humanity has left Earth behind the colonize the galaxy following a terrible event" - check the grammar here
- "with them treating his plan as a novel as the game as its movie adaptation" - I find this sentence quite confusing, can you reword it?
- "reached #2 in gaming", "dropped to #3" - see MOS:HASH
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Another fantastic article, well done. Will pass this once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 04:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: I've done my best to address the issues raised. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Looks good. Since you refer to them in the lead now as mecha, I'd either refer to them this way in the body, or pipe 'mecha' in the lead to 'mechs', so the choice of word is consistent throughout. Anyway I'm happy for this to pass now. Freikorp (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @ProtoDrake: Also you should mention when the game was released in the lead. Freikorp (talk) 07:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: I've done my best to address the issues raised. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: Another fantastic article, well done. Will pass this once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 04:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)