Talk:Xceedium
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by DanielRigal in topic Badly out of date
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xceedium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Badly out of date
[edit]I don't have time to fix anything now, as I am at work, but I just noticed that this is badly out of date. Xceedium is now owned by CA Technologies. Also we need some Wikiprojects on this. I'll try to remember to update this later but if anybody else wants to pre-empt me that would be more than fine. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Projects added above. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK. I think I am done with this now. The redlinks are gone. Cruft and repetition is reduced. The acquisition is included and the old stuff is moved into the past tense. I doubt it is perfect but it is a lot better than it was. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)