Talk:Xanthobacter sp. SoF1
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Paradoctor in topic Draft is about a species, not a corporation
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Draft is about a species, not a corporation
[edit]@Bobby Cohn: The article subject is a species, not a corporation, so your comment does not make sense. Paradoctor (talk) 23:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Paradoctor, it was a pro forma template ({{compsays}}) but you are absolutely correct. I have addressed the specifics with this edit.
- Courtesy ping to the original author @Jcrudgington: please note the updated nomenclature in my AFC comment. This doesn't change the substance of the advice or the links provided, Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) addresses both corporations and products, "
This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services, is a valid subject
" (emphasis mine). - Another user has also since addressed the TM issues, but the crux of the issue is the lead of the comment "
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company
". Please also make sure to note and respond to the notice on your talk page. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2025 (UTC)- Umm, the article subject is not a product. It is a naturally occuring organism, and as such not patentable. You are talking about solein. But solein is also naturally occuring, so it also is neither patentable nor a commercial product. The relevant notability guideline is WP:NSPECIES.
- As regards the viewpoint, that is a job for WP:NPOV.
- I note that Solar Foods § Solein exists, so this draft should retain the biologically relevant bits, and only a short mention of the commercial use in line with WP:DUE. Paradoctor (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the title of the draft is Xanthobacter sp. SoF1 and if that were the focus of the draft then you are correct with NSPECIES, but that is a distinction without a difference when the focus of the draft is on the product aspects of it in regard to commercialization by a specific corporation and I can find more similarities between this draft and other G11 candidates than I can with an article in Category:Hyphomicrobiales. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:09, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- As long as WP:NSPECIES is satisfied, this is a valid draft, and the remaining concerns can be adressed by editing along the lines outlined in my previous comment. If not, it will get declined. 🤷 Paradoctor (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the title of the draft is Xanthobacter sp. SoF1 and if that were the focus of the draft then you are correct with NSPECIES, but that is a distinction without a difference when the focus of the draft is on the product aspects of it in regard to commercialization by a specific corporation and I can find more similarities between this draft and other G11 candidates than I can with an article in Category:Hyphomicrobiales. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:09, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
